Difference between revisions of "Team:NCTU Formosa/Proof Of Concept"

Line 65: Line 65:
 
                     </path>
 
                     </path>
 
                 </svg>Figure 4. The simulation of LL37 and tetR</div>
 
                 </svg>Figure 4. The simulation of LL37 and tetR</div>
 
 
                <p id="p6">
 
                    &#8195;&#8195;To know how the bacteria in dogs’ oral cavities grow under the effect of our dental bones, we needed to calculate the inhibition amount of LL-37.<br>
 
                    &#8195;&#8195;LL-37 killed growing bacteria with a rate k<sub>k</sub>, and afterwards each dead cell quickly took up N [LL-37]. These [LL-37] were bound to the membrane as well as to the cytoplasm of the cell and are not recycled to attack other cells. The killing formula of LL-37 (1) and the time evolution of concentrations of available [LL-37] (2) was described by the following equations:
 
 
                    <p class="equations">$$(1)\frac{d[B]}{dt}= −k_{k}⋅[B][LL-37]$$</p>
 
                    <p class="equations">$$(2)\frac{d[LL-37]}{dt}= −N⋅k_{k}[B][LL-37]$$</p>
 
                </p>
 
 
                <p id="p7" style="margin-top:50px;">
 
                    And the parameters (Tab3) of this system can be seen below:
 
                </p>
 
            </p>
 
                <div class="table-scroll">
 
                <table>
 
                        <tr>
 
                            <th>Parameters</th>
 
                            <th>Description</th>
 
                            <th>Values</th>
 
                            <th>Units</th>
 
                        </tr>
 
                          <tr>
 
                            <td>k<sub>k<sub></td>
 
                            <td>killing rate <sub>[4]</sub></i></td>
 
                            <td>0.04</td>
 
                            <td>1/μM·min</td>
 
                        </tr>
 
                      <tr>
 
                            <td>N</td>
 
                            <td>LL-37 absorbed per dead cell <sub>[4]</sub></td>
 
                            <td>0.35</td>
 
                            <td>μM/O.D</td>
 
                        </tr>
 
                </table>
 
                </div>
 
                <div class="sub">Table 3. Parameters of the inhibition System of LL-37</div>
 
                <p>
 
                    &#8195;&#8195;This model simulate the experiment result
 
                </p>
 
  
 
                 <p id="p17-1">
 
                 <p id="p17-1">
                     &#8195;&#8195;When the concentration of bacteria was low, DenTeeth would start to produce BMP2, STATH and GFP. Thus, we wanted to predict the production of these proteins. Considering the Quorum Sensing Model, we could write down the formula(Eq.5) <sub>[7]</sub>:
+
                     &#8195;&#8195;When the concentration of bacteria was low, DenTeeth would start to produce BMP2, STATH and GFP. Thus, we wanted to predict the production of these proteins. Considering the Quorum Sensing Model, we constructed the simulation of BMP2 and STATH.<br>
                    <p class="equations">$$\frac{d[BMP2]}{dt}= C_{ptet} ·({l_{ptet}+\frac{1-l_{ptet}}{1+(\frac{[tet]}{k_{tet}})^{n_{tet}} } })-(d_{BMP2} ·[BMP2])$$</p>
+
                    <p class="equations">$$\frac{d[STATH]}{dt}= C_{ptet} ·({l_{ptet}+\frac{1-l_{ptet}}{1+(\frac{[tet]}{k_{tet}})^{n_{tet}} } })-(d_{STATH} ·[STATH])$$</p>
+
                    <p class="equations">$$\frac{d[GFP]}{dt}= C_{ptet} ·({l_{ptet}+\frac{1-l_{ptet}}{1+(\frac{[tet]}{k_{tet}})^{n_{tet}} } })-(d_{GFP} ·[GFP])$$</p>
+
                    <div class="sub">Equation 5. BMP2, STATH and GFP production simulation formula</div>
+
                </p>
+
                <p id="p17-2" style="margin-top:50px;">
+
                    And the parameters (Tab.5) can be seen below <sub>[7]</sub>:
+
                </p>
+
                <div class="table-scroll">
+
                <table>
+
                        <tr>
+
                            <th>Parameters</th>
+
                            <th>Description</th>
+
                            <th>Values</th>
+
                            <th>Units</th>
+
                        </tr>
+
                        <tr>
+
                            <td>C<sub>tet<sub></td>
+
                            <td>maximum transcription rate of ptet</i></td>
+
                            <td>2.79</td>
+
                            <td>min<sup>-1</sup></td>
+
                        </tr>
+
                        <tr>
+
                            <td>I<sub>ptet<sub></td>
+
                            <td>leakage factor of ptet</i></td>
+
                            <td>0.002</td>
+
                            <td>-</td>
+
                        </tr>
+
                        <tr>
+
                            <td>k<sub>tet<sub></td>
+
                            <td>dissociation constant of ptet</i></td>
+
                            <td>6</td>
+
                            <td>-</td>
+
                        </tr>
+
                        <tr>
+
                            <td>n<sub>tet<sub></td>
+
                            <td>hills coefficient</i></td>
+
                            <td>3</td>
+
                            <td>-</td>
+
                        </tr>
+
                        <tr>
+
                            <td>d<sub>BMP2<sub></td>
+
                            <td>degradation rate of BMP2</i></td>
+
                            <td>0.05</td>
+
                            <td>min<sup>-1</sup></td>
+
                        </tr>
+
                        <tr>
+
                            <td>d<sub>STATH<sub></td>
+
                            <td>degradation rate of STATH</i></td>
+
                            <td>0.0000248</td>
+
                            <td>min<sup>-1</sup></td>
+
                        </tr>
+
                        <tr>
+
                            <td>d<sub>GFP<sub></td>
+
                            <td>degradation rate of GFP</i></td>
+
                            <td>0.347</td>
+
                            <td>min<sup>-1</sup></td>
+
                        </tr>
+
                </table>
+
                </div>
+
                <div class="sub">Table 6. Parameters of BMP2, STATH and GFP production simulation</div>
+
 
                 <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/9/95/T--NCTU_Formosa--BMP2_STATH_GFP_V.S._time.png" class="images" id=" Concen_BSG" alt=" Concentration simulation of BSG"/>
 
                 <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/9/95/T--NCTU_Formosa--BMP2_STATH_GFP_V.S._time.png" class="images" id=" Concen_BSG" alt=" Concentration simulation of BSG"/>
 
                 <div class="explanation"><svg class="icon" aria-hidden="true" data-prefix="fas" data-icon="arrow-circle-up"
 
                 <div class="explanation"><svg class="icon" aria-hidden="true" data-prefix="fas" data-icon="arrow-circle-up"
Line 178: Line 77:
  
 
                 <p id="p18" style="margin-top:50px;">
 
                 <p id="p18" style="margin-top:50px;">
                     &#8195;&#8195;In order to observe the switching between sterilization and restoration of DenTeeth, we added RFP after the sterilization sequence and GFP after the restoration sequence. Next, we simulated the relative fluorescence intensity of RFP and GFP to know the actual operation of DenTeeth. The result is shown in the figure below. (Fig.6):
+
                     &#8195;&#8195;In order to observe the switching between sterilization and restoration of DenTeeth, we added RFP after the sterilization sequence and GFP after the restoration sequence. Next, we simulated the relative fluorescence intensity of RFP and GFP to know the actual operation of DenTeeth. The result is shown in the figure below. :
 
                 </p>
 
                 </p>
  
Line 188: Line 87:
 
                     </path>
 
                     </path>
 
                 </svg>Figure 6. The relative intensity of GFP and RFP</div>
 
                 </svg>Figure 6. The relative intensity of GFP and RFP</div>
 
+
                <p>
 +
                    &#8195;&#8195;This model calculates and simulates the experiment result.
 
             </div>
 
             </div>
  

Revision as of 22:55, 21 October 2021


Loading...

dark_mode Dark Mode
  • Introduction
  • Bacteria Growth Simulation with DenTeeth
  • LL-37 tetR mRFP and BMP2 STATH GFP Production Simulation
  • Model Validation
  • Protein Functional Test
  • Efficiency Optimization Model
  • DenTeeth-bone

Introduction

Concept

  DenTeeth can produce antimicrobial peptides, LL-37 when the concentration of bacteria in the mouth is higher. After the growth of bacteria is inhibited, STATH and BMP2 will express, maintaining a high calcium level in saliva, and repairing soft tissues in the oral cavity. Therefore, oral problems, especially periodontal disease can be successfully prevented.

How do we prove it?

  We proved our concept with a meticulous process which can be roughly divided into three parts: Model, Lab Work, and Device design. Combining modeling results and predictions with our lab work, we enable to make DenTeeth work as we imagined. We could further prove that DenTeeth can be implemented in the real world for daily usages.

Bacteria Growth Simulation with DenTeeth

  Considered the previous growth model plus the killing formula of LL37. We constructed model to simulate the growth curve of E. coli and P.gingivalis with DenTeeth.  growth curve of E. coli and P.gingivalis

Figure 2. The growth curve of E. coli and P. gingivalis with DenTeeth

  As we can see above, the concentration of P. gingivalis and E. coli are reduced. And finally they will achieve dynamic balance.

LL-37 tetR mRFP and BMP2 STATH GFP Production Simulation

  Because E. coli itself would also be affected by LL37, in order to test whether this will further affect the concentration of the target product, we then used the analysis above to predict the concentration of these products over time.
  The total amount of AHL was composed of the initial AHL from the quorum sensing model. The AHL-LuxR complex would activate the Plux promoter , which could lead to the production of LL37, tetR and mRFP.
 growth curve of E. coli and P.gingivalis

Figure 4. The simulation of LL37 and tetR

  When the concentration of bacteria was low, DenTeeth would start to produce BMP2, STATH and GFP. Thus, we wanted to predict the production of these proteins. Considering the Quorum Sensing Model, we constructed the simulation of BMP2 and STATH.
 Concentration simulation of BSG

Figure 5. The simulation of BMP2 and STATH

  In order to observe the switching between sterilization and restoration of DenTeeth, we added RFP after the sterilization sequence and GFP after the restoration sequence. Next, we simulated the relative fluorescence intensity of RFP and GFP to know the actual operation of DenTeeth. The result is shown in the figure below. :

 Concentration simulation of BSG
Figure 6. The relative intensity of GFP and RFP

  This model calculates and simulates the experiment result.

Model Validation

  Considered the previous growth model plus the killing formula of LL-37. We could write down the growth model of E. coli and P.gingivalis under the inhibition action of DenTeeth(Eq.3):

$$\frac{d[E. coli]}{dt}= g_{E. coli}(1-\frac{[E. coli]}{[E. coli_{Max}]})-k_{k}[B][LL-37]$$

$$\frac{d[P]}{dt}= g_{P}[P](1-\frac{[P]}{P_{Max}})-N⋅k_{k} [B][LL-37] $$

Equation 3. E. coli and P.gingivalis growth with DenTeeth
 growth curve of E. coli and P.gingivalis
Figure 2. The growth curve of E. coli and P.gingivalis with DenTeeth

  As we can see above, the concentration of P.gingivalis and E. coli are reduced. And finally they will achieve dynamic balance.

Protein Functional Test

  Because E. coli itself would also be affected by LL-37, in order to test whether this will further affect the concentration of the target product, we then used the analysis above to predict the concentration of these products over time.
  The total amount of AHL was composed of the initial AHL from the quorum sensing model. The AHL-LuxR complex would activate the Plux promoter , which could lead to the production of LL-37, tetR and mRFP.
  The prediction formula of LL-37 tetR RFP are shown below(Eq.4) [6]:

$$\frac{d[mLL-37]}{dt}= K_{mLuxI}·β·[(A-R)_{2}]-deg_{mLL-37}[mLL-37]$$

$$\frac{d[mtetR]}{dt}= K_{mLuxI}·β·[(A-R)_{2}]-deg_{mtetR}[mtetR]$$

$$\frac{d[mRFP]}{dt}= K_{mLuxI}·β·[(A-R)_{2}]-deg_{mRFP}[mRFP]$$

$$\frac{d[LL-37]}{dt}= k_{LL-37}·[mLL-37]-deg_{LL-37}[LL-37]$$

$$\frac{d[tetR]}{dt}= k_{tetR}·[tetR]-deg_{tetR}[tetR]$$

$$\frac{d[RFP]}{dt}= k_{RFP}·[RFP]-deg_{RFP}[RFP]$$

$$β=\frac{k_{a}+α[LuxR-AHL_{in}]_{2}}{k_{a}+[LuxR-AHL_{in}]_{2}}$$

Equation 4. LL-37, tetR and mRFP production simulation formula

And the parameters (Tab.5) can be seen below [6]:

Parameters Description Values Units
KmLuxI Plasmid copy number times LuxI transcription rate 23.3230 nM*min-1
ka Dissociation rate of LuxR-AHLin2 200 nM
α Basal expression of LuxI 0.01 -
kLL-37 translation rate of mLL-37 6.52 min-1
ktetR translation rate of mtetR 0.14 min-1
kRFP translation rate of mRFP 0.54 min-1
dmLL-37 degradation rate of mLL-37 0.24 min-1
dmtetR degradation rate of mtetR 0.35 min-1
dmRFP degradation rate of mRFP 0.258 min-1
dLL-37 degradation rate of LL-37 0.011 min-1
dtetR degradation rate of tetR 0.1386 min-1
dRFP degradation rate of RFP 0.498 min-1
Table 5. Parameters of LL-37 tetR RFP production simulation
 growth curve of E. coli and P.gingivalis
Figure 4. The simulation of LL-37 and tetR

Efficiency Optimization Model

  When the concentration of bacteria was low, DenTeeth would start to produce BMP2, STATH and GFP. Thus, we wanted to predict the production of these proteins. Considering the Quorum Sensing Model, we could write down the formula(Eq.5) [7]:

$$\frac{d[BMP2]}{dt}= C_{ptet} ·({l_{ptet}+\frac{1-l_{ptet}}{1+(\frac{[tet]}{k_{tet}})^{n_{tet}} } })-(d_{BMP2} ·[BMP2])$$

$$\frac{d[STATH]}{dt}= C_{ptet} ·({l_{ptet}+\frac{1-l_{ptet}}{1+(\frac{[tet]}{k_{tet}})^{n_{tet}} } })-(d_{STATH} ·[STATH])$$

$$\frac{d[GFP]}{dt}= C_{ptet} ·({l_{ptet}+\frac{1-l_{ptet}}{1+(\frac{[tet]}{k_{tet}})^{n_{tet}} } })-(d_{GFP} ·[GFP])$$

Equation 5. BMP2, STATH and GFP production simulation formula

And the parameters (Tab.5) can be seen below [7]:

Parameters Description Values Units
Ctet maximum transcription rate of ptet 2.79 min-1
Iptet leakage factor of ptet 0.002 -
ktet dissociation constant of ptet 6 -
ntet hills coefficient 3 -
dBMP2 degradation rate of BMP2 0.05 min-1
dSTATH degradation rate of STATH 0.0000248 min-1
dGFP degradation rate of GFP 0.347 min-1
Table 6. Parameters of BMP2, STATH and GFP production simulation
 Concentration simulation of BSG
Figure 5. The simulation of BMP2 and STATH

  In order to observe the switching between inhibition and restoration of DenTeeth, we added RFP after the inhibition sequence and GFP after the restoration sequence. Next, we simulated the relative fluorescence intensity of RFP and GFP to know the actual operation of DenTeeth. The result is shown in the figure below. (Fig.6):

 Concentration simulation of BSG
Figure 6. The relative intensity of GFP and RFP

DenTeeth-bone

Concept

  DenTeeth can produce antimicrobial peptides, LL-37 when the concentration of bacteria in the mouth is higher. After the growth of bacteria is inhibited, STATH and BMP2 will express, maintaining a high calcium level in saliva, and repairing soft tissues in the oral cavity. Therefore, oral problems, especially periodontal disease can be successfully prevented.

How do we prove it?

  We proved our concept with a meticulous process which can be roughly divided into three parts: Model, Lab Work, and Device design. Combining modeling results and predictions with our lab work, we enable to make DenTeeth work as we imagined. We could further prove that DenTeeth can be implemented in the real world for daily usages.


Reference

  1. Schink, S. J., et al. (2019). "Death rate of E. coli during starvation is set by maintenance cost and biomass recycling." 9(1): 64-73. e63.
footer_bg footer_nctu footer_fox
FOLLOW US
fb ig
CONTACT US
mail
LOCATION
location