Jonas232005 (Talk | contribs) |
Jonas232005 (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
<div class="two-image-with-desc"> | <div class="two-image-with-desc"> | ||
<div class="im-group"> | <div class="im-group"> | ||
− | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/ | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/e/e4/T--HK_GTC--1a.jpeg"> |
<p>Figure 1a. PET film after incubation with WT PETase</p> | <p>Figure 1a. PET film after incubation with WT PETase</p> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
− | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/ | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/a/af/T--HK_GTC--1b.jpeg"> |
<p>Figure 1b. PET film after incubation with the PETase mutant, S245I | <p>Figure 1b. PET film after incubation with the PETase mutant, S245I | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
− | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/ | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/0/01/T--HK_GTC--1c.png"> |
<p>Figure 1c. Buffer-only control of PET film | <p>Figure 1c. Buffer-only control of PET film | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
<div class="single-image-with-desc"> | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | ||
− | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/d/ | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/d/dc/T--HK_GTC--2a.png"> |
<p>Figure 2a. HPLC spectrum of TPA standard.</p> | <p>Figure 2a. HPLC spectrum of TPA standard.</p> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
− | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/ | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/5/58/T--HK_GTC--2b.png"> |
<p>Figure 2b. HPLC spectrum of MHET standard.</p> | <p>Figure 2b. HPLC spectrum of MHET standard.</p> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
− | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/2/ | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/2/2e/T--HK_GTC--2c.png"> |
<p>Figure 2c. HPLC spectrum of products released from the PET film digested with WT PETase.</p> | <p>Figure 2c. HPLC spectrum of products released from the PET film digested with WT PETase.</p> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
− | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/ | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/6/60/T--HK_GTC--2d_new.png"> |
<p>Figure 2d. HPLC spectrum of products released from the PET film digested with S245I PETase.</p> | <p>Figure 2d. HPLC spectrum of products released from the PET film digested with S245I PETase.</p> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<p>HPLC profiles of products released from PET film digestions using a single enzyme, WT PETase or S245I | <p>HPLC profiles of products released from PET film digestions using a single enzyme, WT PETase or S245I | ||
− | + | PETase revealed incomplete PET hydrolysis as considerable amounts of intermediate product, MHET, which | |
− | + | showed a peak at 5.07 minutes were detected (Figure 2c and Figure 2d). | |
− | + | Thus, we hypothesized that the presence of a second enzyme, MHETase, which hydrolyzes MHET into TPA, in | |
− | + | the | |
− | + | PET depolymerization system synergizes the degradation rate of PET into its constituting monomers. | |
− | + | Therefore, to completely depolymerize PET, we aimed to develop dual-enzyme systems consisting of PETase | |
+ | and | ||
+ | MHETase in this project. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | + | <h2 id="2">2. Confirmation of the presence of insert DNA in plasmid constructs</h2> | |
− | + | <p>A dual-enzyme system of PETase and MHETase is developed in the form of chimeras or enzyme cocktails. | |
− | + | For the chimeric constructs covalently linking PETase and MHETase, C-terminus of both WT PETase and | |
− | + | S245I PETase were linked to the N-terminus of MHETase using a 12 amino acid serine-glycine linker, | |
− | + | forming WT PETase-MHETase and S245I PETase-MHETase chimeric constructs. The chimeric constructs were | |
− | + | then cloned into the expression vector pET-21b digested with NdeI and XhoI. pET-21b has a C-terminal | |
− | + | His-Tag for subsequent protein purification. Besides, gene encoding MHETase from Ideonella sakaiensis | |
− | + | was also cloned into NdeI and XhoI digested pET-21b for subsequent protein purification and used in | |
− | + | enzyme cocktail experiments. | |
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | <p>Colony PCR<br>We transformed the three recombinant plasmids, MHETase-pET-21b, WT PETase-MHETase-pET21b | |
− | + | and S245I PETase-MHETase-pET 21b in E. coli C41 (DE3) and TOP10 competent cells. We performed colony | |
− | + | PCR to confirm the presence of insert DNA in plasmids after transformation. | |
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/1/1b/T--HK_GTC--3.png"> | |
− | + | <p>Figure 3. Colony PCR screening of constructs transformed in C41(DE3) competent cells.</p> | |
− | + | </center> | |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/c/cb/T--HK_GTC--4.png"> | |
− | + | <p>Figure 4. Colony PCR screening of constructs transformed in TOP10 competent cells.</p> | |
− | + | </center> | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | <p>Figure 3 and Figure 4 showed that PCR products with the correct size of 498 bp were amplified in all | |
− | + | constructs confirming the presence of MHETase, WT PETase-MHETase and S245I PETase-MHETase in the | |
− | + | expression vector pET-21b. | |
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | <h2 id="3">3. PET hydrolytic activities of PETase and MHETase cocktails</h2> | |
− | + | <h3 id="current">(A) Protein expression and purification of WT PETase, S245I PETase and MHETase</h3> | |
− | + | <p>Proteins of WT PETase, MHETase and S245I PETase were expressed in E. coli C41(DE3) and induced by the | |
− | + | addition of 0.5mM final concentration of IPTG in a 100mL LC medium shake at room temperature for 16 – | |
− | + | 20h. Proteins were extracted and purified. The size of WT PETase and S245I PETase is 30kDa and that of | |
− | + | MHETase is 65kDa. | |
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/7/7e/T--HK_GTC--5.png"> | |
− | + | <p>Figure 5. SDS PAGE of purified MHETase, WT PETase and S245I PETase proteins. </p> | |
− | + | </center> | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | <h3 id="current">(B) Bradford protein assay</h3> | |
− | + | <p>We performed Bradford protein assay to determine the concentration of our purified proteins.<br> | |
− | + | The resulting concentrations of WT PETase, S245I PETase, and MHETase are at 1.35 mg/mL, 1.61 mg/mL, | |
− | + | and 0.77 mg/mL respectively. | |
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/6/6b/T--HK_GTC--6.png"> | |
− | + | <p>Figure 6. BSA standard curve. The line of best fit is drawn, with the R2 value being 0.994.</p> | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | <h3 id="current">(C) PET film digestion</h3> | |
− | + | <p>To analyze the degradation rate of PET by enzyme cocktails, commercial PET film was used as the | |
− | + | substrate for enzyme assay. The PET film was prepared in a square form with a length of 6 mm. It was | |
− | + | then soaked in 300μL of pH 9.0 glycine-NaOH buffer with 4μg or 8μg of enzymes. | |
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | <p>In the enzyme cocktails, 4μg WT PETase or S245I PETase were mixed with 4μg and 8 μg MHETase. A | |
− | + | solution with only 4μg WT PETase and a solution with only S245I PETase was used as a control to | |
− | + | compare the PET degradation rate of single-enzyme systems and dual-enzymes systems. | |
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | |
− | + | <center> | |
− | + | <table style="width:100%"> | |
− | + | <tr> | |
− | + | <td>Reaction</td> | |
− | + | <td>Concentration of WT PETase (μg)</td> | |
− | + | <td>Concentration of S245I PETase (μg)</td> | |
− | + | <td>Concentration of MHETase (μg)</td> | |
− | + | </tr> | |
− | + | <tr> | |
− | + | <td>1</td> | |
− | + | <td>4</td> | |
− | + | <td>0</td> | |
− | + | <td>4</td> | |
− | + | </tr> | |
− | + | <tr> | |
− | + | <td>2</td> | |
− | + | <td>4</td> | |
− | + | <td>0</td> | |
− | + | <td>8</td> | |
− | + | </tr> | |
− | + | <tr> | |
− | + | <td>3</td> | |
− | + | <td>4</td> | |
− | + | <td>0</td> | |
− | + | <td>0</td> | |
− | + | </tr> | |
− | + | <tr> | |
− | + | <td>4</td> | |
− | + | <td>0</td> | |
− | + | <td>4</td> | |
− | + | <td>4</td> | |
− | + | </tr> | |
− | + | <tr> | |
− | + | <td>5</td> | |
− | + | <td>0</td> | |
− | + | <td>4</td> | |
− | + | <td>8</td> | |
− | + | </tr> | |
− | + | <tr> | |
− | + | <td>6</td> | |
− | + | <td>0</td> | |
− | + | <td>4</td> | |
− | + | <td>0</td> | |
− | + | </tr> | |
− | + | <tr> | |
− | + | <td>7</td> | |
− | + | <td>0</td> | |
− | + | <td>0</td> | |
− | + | <td>0</td> | |
− | + | </tr> | |
− | + | </table> | |
− | + | <p>Table 2. Combinations of WT PETase, S245I PETase and MHETase in different enzyme cocktails.</p> | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | <p> | |
− | + | The reaction mixture was incubated at 30°C for 96h. The reaction mixture was terminated by dilution of | |
− | + | the aqueous solution with 160mM phosphate buffer (pH 2.5) containing 10% (v/v) DMSO followed by | |
− | + | heating at 85°C for 15 min, after which the PET film was removed from the reaction mixture. Then the | |
− | + | samples were centrifuged at 13,200 rpm for 10 min. 20μL of the supernatant was analyzed by HPLC. The | |
− | + | film was washed with 1% SDS and 20% ethanol in distilled water. | |
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | <h3 id="current">(D) HPLC of eluents of digested PET film with different enzyme cocktails</h3> | |
− | + | <h4 id="current">(i) TPA Standard</h4> | |
− | + | <p>Maximum intensity: 36000cps at 4.62 min </p> | |
− | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/2/2f/T--HK_GTC--7.png"> | |
− | + | <p>Figure 7. HPLC profile of 25μM TPA standard</p> | |
− | + | </center> | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | <h4 id="current">(ii) Products released from the PET film incubated with WT PETase and MHETase cocktails | |
− | + | </h4> | |
− | + | <p>Maximum intensity: 1736.7 cps at 4.64 min</p> | |
− | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/1/1b/T--HK_GTC--8a.png.jpg"> | |
− | + | <p>Figure 8a. HPLC profile of products released from PET film digestion using 4 μg WT PETase and 4 | |
− | + | μg MHETase</p> | |
− | + | </center> | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | <p>Maximum intensity: 3986.7 cps at 4.62 min</p> | |
− | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/a/ac/T--HK_GTC--8b.png"> | |
− | + | <p>Figure 8b. HPLC profile of products released from PET film digestion using 4 μg WT PETase and 8 | |
− | + | μg MHETase</p> | |
− | + | </center> | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | <p>Maximum intensity: 16000 cps at 4.63 min</p> | |
− | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/e/ec/T--HK_GTC--8c.png"> | |
− | + | <p>Figure 8c. HPLC profile of products released from PET film digestion using 4 μg WT PETase only | |
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | </center> | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | <h4 id="current">(iii) Products released from the PET film incubated with S245I PETase and MHETase | |
− | + | cocktails</h4> | |
− | + | <p>Maximum intensity: 7756.7 cps at 4.63 min</p> | |
− | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/3/37/T--HK_GTC--9a.png"> | |
− | + | <p>Figure 9a. HPLC profile of products released from PET film digestion using 4 μg S245I PETase and | |
− | + | 4 μg MHETase</p> | |
+ | </center> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <p>Maximum intensity: 8166.7 cps at 4.62 min</p> | ||
+ | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | ||
+ | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/9/93/T--HK_GTC--9b.png"> | ||
+ | <p>Figure 9b. HPLC profile of products released from PET film digestion using 4 μg S245I PETase and | ||
+ | 8 μg MHETase</p> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <p>Maximum intensity: 4906.7 cps at 4.63 min</p> | ||
+ | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | ||
+ | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/0/02/T--HK_GTC--9c.png"> | ||
+ | <p>Figure 9c. HPLC profile of products released from PET film digestion using 4 μg S245I PETase | ||
+ | only</p> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <h4 id="current">(iv) Products released from the PET film incubated with buffer only</h4> | ||
+ | <p>Maximum intensity: 2193.3 cps at 4.63 min</p> | ||
+ | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | ||
+ | <center><img src="httpshttps://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/a/a6/T--HK_GTC--10.png"> | ||
+ | <p>Figure 10. HPLC profile of products released from PET film digestion without using enzyme | ||
+ | (negative control)</p> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <h4 id="current">(v) Quantification of TPA released from PET film digestion with different enzyme | ||
+ | cocktails</h4> | ||
+ | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | ||
+ | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/6/69/T--HK_GTC--11.jpeg"> | ||
+ | <p>Figure 11. A standard curve of TPA determined by HPLC.</p> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | ||
+ | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/d/d3/T--HK_GTC--fig12.jpg"> | ||
+ | <p>Figure 12. Concentration of TPA released from PET film digestion using different enzyme | ||
+ | cocktails.<br> | ||
+ | S1: 4μg WT PETase and 4μg MHETase; S2: 4μg WT PETase and 8μg MHETase: S3: 4μg WT PETase only | ||
+ | S4: 4μg S245I PETase and 4μg MHETase;<br> S5: 4μg S245I PETase and 8μg MHETase: S4: 4μg S245I | ||
+ | only | ||
+ | S7: buffer only | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>HPLC profiles demonstrated that the detection peak representing TPA monomer has a retention time at | ||
+ | 4.62 minutes (Figure 7). </p> | ||
+ | <p>HPLC profiles of products released from PET film digestions using WT PETase and MHETase demonstrated | ||
+ | that a mixture of WT PETase and MHETase in a 1:2 ratio exhibited better depolymerization performance | ||
+ | than that in a 1:1 ratio as more monomers were released (Figure 8a and Figure 8b). However, the extent | ||
+ | of depolymerization achieved by WT PETase alone was the highest (Figure 8c) suggesting that the | ||
+ | addition of MHETase inhibited or slowed down the PET degradation. We cannot exclude the possibility | ||
+ | that the fusion of MHETase to WT PETase impaired activity of WT PETase and subsequent PET | ||
+ | depolymerization. Thus, the experimental result needs to be further investigated. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p>On the other hand, the enzyme cocktail with S245I PETase and MHETase synergizes PET degradation. A | ||
+ | mixture of S245I PETase and MHETase in a 1:2 ratio shows similar degradation activity with that in a | ||
+ | 1:1 ratio but both exhibited better degradation activity than the mixture with S245I PETase alone as | ||
+ | more TPA were determined in the cocktails (Figure 9a – c). | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p>A standard curve of TPA was obtained by HPLC analysis of 9 standard solutions (0.098μM, 0.195μM, | ||
+ | 0.397μM, 0.78μM, 1.56μM, 3.125μM, 6.25μM, 12.5μM and 25μM) using serial dilution (Figure 11). PET film | ||
+ | digestion eluent has a background intensity of 2193 cps as determined by HPLC (Figure 10). TPA | ||
+ | concentration released from PET film digestion using different enzyme cocktails demonstrated that the | ||
+ | mixture with S245I PETase only released 2.02 ng/mL TPA, while the mixture with 1:1 and 1:2 ratio of | ||
+ | S245I PETase and MHETase released 3.49 ng/mL and 3.44 ng/mL (Figure 12). Comparing the extent of PET | ||
+ | degradation by S245I PETase alone, addition of MHETase synergizes depolymerization process by | ||
+ | increasing constituent monomer, TPA, up to 1.7 folds. The findings revealed that our engineered | ||
+ | mutant, S245I PETase, which outperforms WT PETase, further synergizes PET depolymerization in the | ||
+ | presence of MHETase. </p> | ||
+ | <h3 id="current">(D) SEM of digested PET film incubated with different enzyme cocktails</h3> | ||
+ | <h4 id="current">(i)PET film incubated with WT PETase and MHETase cocktails</h4> | ||
+ | <div class="two-image-with-desc"> | ||
+ | <div class="im-group"> | ||
+ | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/a/ae/T--HK_GTC--13a.jpeg"> | ||
+ | <p>Figure 13a. PET film after incubation with 4μg WT PETase and 4μg MHETase</p> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/e/ee/T--HK_GTC--13b.png"> | |
− | + | <p>Figure 13b. PET film after incubation with 4μg WT PETase and 8μg MHETase | |
− | + | ||
− | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/ | + | |
− | <p>Figure | + | |
− | + | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/2/2b/T--HK_GTC--13c.jpeg"> | |
− | + | <p>Figure 13c. PET film after incubation with 4μg WT PETase only | |
− | + | ||
− | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/ | + | |
− | <p>Figure | + | |
− | + | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | <h4 id="current">(ii) PET film incubated with S245I PETase and MHETase cocktails</h4> | |
− | + | <div class="two-image-with-desc"> | |
− | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/ | + | <div class="im-group"> |
− | <p>Figure | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/d/de/T--HK_GTC--14a.png"> |
− | + | <p>Figure 14a. PET film after incubation with 4μg S245I PETase and 4μg MHETase</p> | |
</center> | </center> | ||
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/d/dc/T--HK_GTC--14b.png"> | |
− | + | <p>Figure 14b. PET film after incubation with 4μg S245I PETase and 8μg MHETase | |
− | + | </center> | |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/f/fb/T--HK_GTC--14c.jpeg"> | |
− | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/ | + | <p>Figure 14c. PET film after incubation with 4μg S245I PETase only |
− | <p>Figure | + | |
</center> | </center> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | + | </div> | |
− | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/ | + | <h4 id="current">(iii) PET film incubated with buffer only</h4> |
− | <p>Figure | + | <div class="two-image-with-desc"> |
− | + | <div class="im-group"> | |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/6/6c/T--HK_GTC--15.png"> | |
− | + | <p>Figure 15. PET film after incubation with buffer only</p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
+ | <center> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <p>Consistent with the result from HPLC, the pitting of PET film surface resulting from the digestion of | ||
+ | WT PETase only is much more significant than from the digestion of WT PETase and MHETase cocktails | ||
+ | (Figure 13a – c). Similarly, the pitting of PET film surface resulting from the digestion of 1:1 and | ||
+ | 1:2 ratio of S245I PETase and MHETase is much more significant than from the digestion of S245I PETase | ||
+ | only (Figure 14a – c). Consistent with enzyme assay results shown in 2019, S245I PETase exhibits a | ||
+ | higher depolymerization activity. No pitting of PET film surface was observed in mixture with buffer | ||
+ | only (Figure 15). Our HPLC and SEM results demonstrated that cocktail mixtures of 1:1 or 1:2 ratio of | ||
+ | S245I PETase and MHETase synergize PET depolymerization process compared with S245I PETase alone.</p> | ||
+ | <h2 id="4">4. PET hydrolytic activities of PETase-MHETase chimeras </h2> | ||
+ | <h3>(A) Protein expression and purification of WT PETase-MHETase and S245I PETase-MHETase </h3> | ||
+ | <p>Proteins of PETase-MHETase chimeras were expressed in E. coli C41(DE3). Using the same protein | ||
+ | extraction | ||
+ | method as that of PETase and MHETase as described in section 3(A) in which chimeric protein was | ||
+ | induced | ||
+ | by | ||
+ | the addition of 0.5mM final concentration of IPTG in a 100mL LC medium shake at room temperature for | ||
+ | 16 – | ||
+ | 20h, no WT PETase-MHETase chimeric protein was expressed. The size of WT PETase-MHETase is 95kDa. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
− | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/5/59/T--HK_GTC--16.png" alt=""></center> | |
− | + | <p> Figure 16. SDS-PAGE of purified WT PETase, S245I PETase and WT PET-MHETase</p> | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | <p>To optimize the condition for protein expression, we changed the induction condition in which the | ||
+ | 400mL | ||
+ | culture medium was induced with 0.5mM IPTG and shook at 16°C for 24 - 30h. | ||
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | </p> | + | <p>Protein extraction protocol was also revised. After induction, 400 mL bacterial culture was divided |
+ | into | ||
+ | two | ||
+ | 200 mL solutions and harvested the cells by centrifugation at 5,000 rpm at 4°C for 15 minutes. The | ||
+ | cell | ||
+ | pellets were resuspended by adding 20 mL of lysis buffer. We further sonicated the suspension 5 times | ||
+ | for | ||
+ | 15 | ||
+ | cycles; each cycle consists of 10s with sonication followed by 10s without sonication. The sonication | ||
+ | power | ||
+ | is 6-8 W. After centrifuging at 13,000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C, 20mL supernatants were collected. 2 mL | ||
+ | Ni-NTA | ||
+ | resin was washed with lysis buffer for 5 times with short spins at 3,000 rpm and kept on ice. Then, 10 | ||
+ | mL | ||
+ | of | ||
+ | the supernatant was mixed with 1 mL Ni-NTA resin and then shook on ice for 1 hour at 50 rpm. After | ||
+ | rinsing | ||
+ | the Nickel column 3 - 4 times with lysis buffer, the mixture was loaded to a column. The column was | ||
+ | then | ||
+ | washed 3 times with wash buffer and 3 times with 2 mL elution buffer. For SDS-PAGE, we mixed 15 µL of | ||
+ | purified proteins and 5 µL 4x loading dye and loaded into the wells. The size of PETase-MHETase | ||
+ | chimera | ||
+ | is | ||
+ | 95kDa, with PETase and MHETase are 30kDa and 65 kDa respectively. If our proteins are successfully | ||
+ | expressed | ||
+ | and purified, they should give a thick band in the area corresponding to their mass in the SDS-PAGE. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
− | < | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/5/51/T--HK_GTC--ex_2_2.png" alt=""></center> | |
− | + | <p>Figure 17. SDS-PAGE of purified WT PETase, S245I PETase, MHETase, WT PET-MHETase and | |
− | + | S245I PETase-MHETase. Arrows showing the correct size of new constructs, MHETase, | |
− | + | WT PETase-MHETase and S245I PETase-MHETase | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | and | + | |
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
− | + | <p>The results of SDS-PAGE demonstrated the presence of purified WT PETase, S245I PETase, MHETase WT | |
− | + | PETase-MHETase, and S245I PETase-MHETase. It also showed that PETase-MHETase chimeras are successfully | |
− | + | expressed and purified despite the presence of multiple bands. The protein induction and extraction | |
− | + | protocol | |
− | + | will be optimized in the future to obtain a single band of chimeric proteins. | |
− | + | </p> | |
− | </ | + | |
− | + | <h3>(B) PET film digestion</h3> | |
− | + | <p>To analyze the degradation activity of engineered chimeras, commercial PET film was used as the | |
− | + | substrate | |
− | + | for enzyme assay. The PET film was prepared in a square form with a length of 6 mm. It was then soaked | |
− | + | in | |
− | </p> | + | 300μL of pH 9.0 glycine-NaOH buffer with 8µL and 16µL of enzymes, MHETase, WT PETase-MHETase and S245I |
+ | PETase-MHETase. A mixture with buffer only was used as a negative control. We incubated the mixtures | ||
+ | for | ||
+ | 96h | ||
+ | at 30°C.</p> | ||
− | + | <h3>(C) HPLC of eluents of digested PET film with different chimeras</h3> | |
− | + | <p>We analyzed the eluent after the PET film digestion, and showed that the solution contained the | |
− | + | constituent | |
− | + | monomer of PET, TPA</p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | <h4>(i) TPA Standard </h4> | |
− | + | <p>Maximum intensity: 2600 cps at 4.64 min </p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | < | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> |
− | <p> | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/9/9b/T--HK_GTC--18.png" alt=""></center> |
+ | <p> Figure 18. HPLC profile of 0.397µM TPA standard | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
− | + | <h4>(ii) Products released from the PET film incubated with MHETase only | |
− | + | </h4> | |
− | + | <p>Maximum intensity: 1050 cps at 4.71 min </p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | |
− | </ | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/3/37/T--HK_GTC--19a.png" alt=""></center> |
− | <p> | + | <p>Figure 19a. HPLC profile of products released from PET film digestion using 8µL MHETase |
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
− | + | <p>Maximum intensity: 1050 cps at 4.66 min </p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
+ | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | ||
+ | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/9/96/T--HK_GTC--19b.png" alt=""></center> | ||
+ | <p> Figure 19. HPLC profile of products released from PET film digestion using 16µL MHETase | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
− | |||
− | + | <h4>(iii) Products released from the PET film incubated with S245I PETase-MHETase | |
− | + | </h4> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | |||
− | + | <p>Maximum intensity: 1160 cps at 4.66 min </p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | < | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> |
− | </ | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/b/bf/T--HK_GTC--20a.png" alt=""></center> |
+ | <p>Figure 20a. HPLC profile of products released from PET film digestion using 8µL S245I | ||
+ | PETase-MHETase | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
− | + | <p>Maximum intensity: 1080 cps at 4.67 min </p> | |
− | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/9/9f/T--HK_GTC--20b.png" alt=""></center> | |
− | + | <p>Figure 20b. HPLC profile of products released from PET film digestion using 16µL S245I | |
− | + | PETase-MHETase | |
− | + | </p> | |
+ | </div> | ||
− | + | <h4>(iv) Products released from the PET film incubated with WT PETase-MHETase | |
+ | </h4> | ||
− | + | <p>Maximum intensity: 1340 cps at 4.67 min</p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | < | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> |
− | <p> | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/0/05/T--HK_GTC--21a.png" alt=""></center> |
+ | <p>Figure 21a. HPLC profile of products released from PET film digestion using 8µL WT PETase-MHETase | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
− | + | <p>Maximum intensity: 990 cps at 4.65 min</p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | < | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> |
+ | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/0/0f/T--HK_GTC--21b.png" alt=""></center> | ||
+ | <p>Figure 21b. HPLC profile of products released from PET film digestion using 16µL WT PETase-MHETase | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
− | + | <h4>(v) Products released from the PET film incubated with buffer only</h4> | |
− | + | <p>Maximum intensity: 680 cps at 4.69 min</p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | < | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/a/aa/T--HK_GTC--22.png" alt=""></center> | |
− | + | <p>Figure 22. HPLC profile of products released from PET film digestion with buffer only | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
− | + | <h4>(vi) Quantification of TPA released from PET film digestion with different chimeras </h4> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/6/6b/T--HK_GTC--Table.png" alt=""></center> | |
− | + | <p>Table 3. Calculated concentration of TPA released from PET film digestion with chimeras | |
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | <p>Equal volume of extracted chimera proteins was used to digest PET film in order to investigate their | |
+ | PET | ||
+ | depolymerization activity. HPLC data showing that trace amounts of TPA were detected in eluents of PET | ||
+ | film digestion with WT PETase-MHETase and S245I PETase-MHETase suggesting that chimeras exhibit PET | ||
+ | depolymerization activity (Table 1). However, their degradation rate could not be compared as the | ||
+ | concentration of chimeric proteins added were different due to the presence of impurities as indicated | ||
+ | by | ||
+ | multiple bands observed in SDS-PAGE. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
− | + | <h4>(D) SEM of digested PET film with different chimeras</h4> | |
− | + | <h5>(i) PET film incubated with MHETase only</h5> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | < | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> |
+ | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/9/93/T--HK_GTC--23.png" alt=""></center> | ||
+ | <p>Figure 23. PET film after incubation with 16μL MHETase | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
− | + | <h5>(ii) PET film incubated with S245I PETase-MHETase chimera</h5> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | < | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> |
+ | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/f/f9/T--HK_GTC--24.png" alt=""></center> | ||
+ | <p>Figure 24. PET film after incubation with 16 μL S245I PETase-MHETase chimera | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
− | + | <h5>(iii) PET film incubated with WT PETase-MHETase chimera</h5> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | < | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/7/7d/T--HK_GTC--25.png" alt=""></center> | |
− | + | <p>Figure 25. PET film after incubation with 16μL WT PETase-MHETase chimera | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
− | + | <h5>(iii) PET film incubated with buffer only</h5> | |
− | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> | |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/7/71/T--HK_GTC--26.jpeg" alt=""></center> | |
− | + | <p>Figure 26. PET film after incubation with 16μL buffer only | |
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | <p>Consistent with the result from HPLC in which chimeric proteins exhibited PET depolymerization | |
− | + | activity | |
− | + | and released trace amount of TPA, the pitting of PET film surfaces resulting from the digestion of | |
− | + | S245I | |
− | + | PETase-MHETase and WT PETase-MHETase was observed (Figure 24 and Figure 25). No pitting of PET film | |
− | + | surface was observed when PET film was incubated with buffer only solution (Figure 26). However, | |
− | + | pitting | |
− | + | of PET film could also be observed in the PET film digested with MHETase only (Figure 23). This result | |
− | </ | + | was not consistent with HPLC data which showed negligible amounts of TPA. The effect of digestion of |
+ | PET | ||
+ | film using MHETase will be further investigated. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
− | + | <h2 id="5">5. SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis </h2> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
+ | <p>Since a few bands were obtained in purified chimeric proteins, WT PETase-MHETase and S245I | ||
+ | PETase-MHETase, SDS-PAGE and western blot were performed to confirm the identity of purified proteins. | ||
+ | The purified proteins, WT PETase, S245I PETase and MHETase were also included in this experiment. All | ||
+ | the | ||
+ | genes encoding PETase, MHETase and their chimeras were cloned into the expression vector pET-21b which | ||
+ | has a C-terminal His-Tag. Therefore, His-Tag antibody was used for the verification of expressed | ||
+ | proteins. </p> | ||
− | <p> | + | <div class="single-image-with-desc"> |
− | + | <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/1/17/T--HK_GTC--27_28.png" alt=""></center> | |
− | + | <p>Lane 1: WT PETase (30kDa) | |
+ | Lane 2: S245I PETase (30kDa) | ||
+ | Lane 3: MHETase (65kDa) <br> | ||
+ | Lane 4: WT PETase – MHETase (95kDa) | ||
+ | Lane 5: S245I PETase – MHETase (95kDa) | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
− | + | <p>Our SDS-PAGE results showed that all purified proteins were expressed (Fig. 27). Clear bands with | |
− | + | correct | |
− | + | sizes were observed in the western blot of all purified proteins (Figure 28). In addition to the band | |
− | + | of | |
− | + | 96kDa, which matched the size of chimeric proteins, an extra band with the size matching to that of | |
− | + | MHETase was observed in the chimeric proteins. This suggests that some chimeric proteins were cleaved | |
− | + | during the process of protein purification. Since MHETase were linked to the C-terminal of WT PETase | |
− | + | and | |
− | + | S245I PETase in the WT PETase-MHETase and S245I PETase-MHETase chimeric constructs respectively, | |
− | + | MHETase | |
− | + | was attached to His-Tag which was located near the C-terminal of expression vector pET 21b.Thus | |
− | + | cleaved | |
− | + | MHETase was detected in both chimeric proteins using His-Tag antibody. </p> | |
− | + | ||
− | </p> | + | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | <p>These findings suggest that enzymatic synergism in dual enzyme PET degrading system is of importance | + | <p>These results demonstrated that our chimeric proteins, WT PETase-MHETase and S245I PETase-MHETase were |
− | + | successfully expressed and purified. They exhibited PET depolymerization activity as seen by trace | |
− | + | amounts of TPA detected in HPLC analysis and the degraded PET film surfaces observed under SEM. | |
− | + | </p> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | <p>To further characterize the chimeric proteins, protein induction and extraction protocols need to be | |
+ | further optimized in order to obtain single purified proteins for subsequent PET digestion | ||
+ | experiments. | ||
+ | Besides, the length and amino acid sequence of protein linker also affect chimeric protein production. | ||
+ | An | ||
+ | effective protein linker provides suitable space between two proteins which will decrease their | ||
+ | intrusion, improve folding and ultimately improve protein production and activity. In our project, a | ||
+ | 12 | ||
+ | amino acid serine-glycine linker was used to covalently link C terminus of WT PETase or S245I PETase | ||
+ | and | ||
+ | N terminus of MHETase to form chimeric proteins. To improve production efficiency and reduce cleavage | ||
+ | between two proteins, linkers of different amino acid lengths and combination need to be tested in | ||
+ | order | ||
+ | to find out the proximity of the two enzymes which would provide the highest PET hydrolytic activity. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>Taken together, our data suggest that single enzyme of PETase mutant, S245I exhibits a higher | ||
+ | depolymerization activity than that of WT PETase. The detection of considerable amounts of | ||
+ | intermediate | ||
+ | products, MHET after PET film digestion extend our idea to the development of dual enzyme system for | ||
+ | complete PET depolymerization. The PET degradation achieved by enzyme cocktails of WT PETase and | ||
+ | MHETase | ||
+ | was inhibited while that of S245I PETase and MHETase was synergized compared with that achieved by | ||
+ | single | ||
+ | enzyme, WT PETase or S245I PETase alone. Therefore, it clearly shows that our engineered mutant, S245I | ||
+ | PETase which outperforms WT PETase, further synergize PET depolymerization in the presence of MHETase. | ||
+ | Additionally, chimeric proteins of PETase and MHETase were successfully expressed and purified. | ||
+ | Preliminary studies suggest that they have PET depolymerization activity. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>These findings suggest that enzymatic synergism in dual enzyme PET degrading system is of importance | ||
+ | to | ||
+ | industrial use. Improved hydrolysis rate compared to single enzyme reduce the use of enzymes and | ||
+ | hydrolysis time and thus the cost of PET depolymerization. More importantly, rapid and complete PET | ||
+ | degradation leads to ways of closing the circle from production to waste. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 687: | Line 701: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<footer> | <footer> | ||
<div> | <div> |
Revision as of 10:49, 19 October 2021