Design
1. Construction of the phenylacetaldehyde synthase (PAAS) metabolic
pathway in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae to produce 2-phenylethanol
(2-PE)
The key enzyme phenylacetaldehyde synthase (PAAS) is
heterologously expressed in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae to produce 2-PE, using
L-phenylalanine
as the substrate. We obtained the gene of the phenylacetaldehyde synthase from the Rose, Petunia
and Vanda[1], respectively. Because of the different codon preference of the species,
these
three genes were conducted codon optimization and introduced into the S. cerevisiae.
PAAS can convert L-phenylalanine to phenylacetaldehyde directly, which
simplifies the original Erich pathway in the S. cerevisiae and reduces the metabolic
burden of
S. cerevisiae. The incorporation of PAAS instead of the three-enzyme Ehrlich pathway
could lead
to a simpler process that will be more convenient in terms of scaling up and with fewer
variables (gene expression, exterior co-factors, etc.) that can influence the process in an
unknown manner. Moreover, this enzyme can be further subjected to protein engineering for
improvement of its activity[2].
Fig. 1 The heterologous expression of PAAS from plants in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
2.Modification of natural TEF2 promoter——synthetic hybrid promoter
approach improving transcription efficiency
Transcription control of specific genes is a direct and effective method to
regulate metabolic flux. Promoters design with various strengths could realize the fine-tune of
gene expression. So this year our team makes efforts to combine core promoter with upstream
activating sequences(UAS elements) to enhance transcription efficiency and tune the expression
of the target gene.
UAS is located upstream of the core promoter and serves as a binding site for
specific transcription activators. The UAS is a crucial region of promoters which boosts gene
expression[3]. The tandem UAS elements of hybrid promoters could serve as synthetic
transcriptional amplifiers to control expression levels[4]. Several UAS elements have
previously
been identified as transcriptional enhancing elements in S. cerevisiae, including a 240
bp
sequence 5’ of the mitotic cyclin coding gene clb2, a 275 bp sequence 5’ of the
mitochondrial
citrate synthase coding gene cit1 and a 203bp sequence 5’ of translational elongation
factor
coding gene tef1, termed UASCLB, UASCIT,
UASTEF respectively[5].
According to the literature, we found that even the strongest native promoters
in S. cerevisiae are limited by a deficiency of UAS enhancer elements. Thus, we hold
that the
function of promoter can be improved by adding tandem UAS elements to the upstream of pTEF,
thereby increasing the expression of PAAS. The modified promoters containing three copies from
different origins are named UASCLB-pTEF, UASCIT-pTEF,
UASTEF-pTEF, respectively.
Fig. 2 Improvement of pTEF
3. Establishment of the yeast-microalgae interaction system
In March 2021, China released the "Peak Carbon 2030 Study" and the "Carbon
Neutral 2060 Study", explaining the significance of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality. Due to
the higher carbon dioxide available for microalgae use in photosynthesis and higher oxygen
availability for heterotrophy of yeast, we got the idea to design a yeast-microalgae system to
reduce carbon dioxide while promoting yeast growth and 2-PE production as well. This
yeast-microalgae interaction system is potential to address three important societal needs: (i)
New mode production of 2-PE; (ii) The protection of aquatic environments; and (iii) The
reduction of the global anthropogenic greenhouse effect[6]. In the mixed culture,
microalgae
could generate oxygen for yeast while yeast provided CO2 to microalgae and produce
2-PE. To
achieve the stable co-cultivation, the growth conditions of the two organisms should be
optimized to improve the stability of our system.
Fig. 3 Schematic diagram of carbon neutralisation
Fig. 4 Schematic of yeast-microalgae interaction system.
4. Utilization of 3D bioactive material printing technology to create a
bioreactor
We used 3D printing technology to combine microalgae with bioactive materials
and then performed a mixed culture of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and microalgae.
The “living
material”, PVA-SA hydrogel, offer significant advantages as a scaffold for living materials
because it provides a cellular environment that is similar to natural biofilms. Also, living
material filaments were generated by electrospinning microbe-polymer solutions[7].
This
immobilized-cell bioreactor offers several advantages, such as reduced reactor down-time, ease
of product removal, and minimized product inhibition and nutrient depletion. In addition, mass
exchange at the medium (PVA-SA hydrogel) interface can be improved by optimizing 3D geometries,
resulting in high catalytic efficiency. To improve the reactor performance, synergistic
optimization of scaffold geometry, bioreactor design, and culture conditions are needed.
Notably, the additive manufacturing of living whole cells can be used not only as a new
bioreactor with high volumetric productivity and long lifetime, but also as a versatile platform
for fundamental studies of microbial behaviors, communications, and interaction with the
microenvironment[8].
Fig. 5 Construction of the bioreactor using 3D printing.
References
1. Kaminaga, Y.; Schnepp, J.; Peel, G.; Kish, C. M.; Ben-Nissan, G.; Weiss, D.;
Orlova, I.; Lavie, O.; Rhodes, D.; Wood, K.; Porterfield, D. M.; Cooper, A. J.; Schloss, J. V.;
Pichersky, E.; Vainstein, A.; Dudareva, N., Plant phenylacetaldehyde synthase is a bifunctional
homotetrameric enzyme that catalyzes phenylalanine decarboxylation and oxidation. J Biol Chem
2006, 281 (33), 23357-66.
2. Achmon, Y.; Ben-Barak Zelas, Z.; Fishman, A., Cloning Rosa hybrid
phenylacetaldehyde synthase for the production of 2-phenylethanol in a whole cell Escherichia
coli system. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2014, 98 (8), 3603-11.
3. Teixeira, M. C.; Monteiro, P. T.; Palma, M.; Costa, C.; Godinho, C. P.; Pais,
P.; Cavalheiro, M.; Antunes, M.; Lemos, A.; Pedreira, T.; Sa-Correia, I., YEASTRACT: an upgraded
database for the analysis of transcription regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Nucleic Acids Res 2018, 46 (D1), D348-D353.
4. Da Silva, N. A.; Srikrishnan, S., Introduction and expression of genes for
metabolic engineering applications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2012, 12 (2),
197-214.
5. Keren, L.; Zackay, O.; Lotan-Pompan, M.; Barenholz, U.; Dekel, E.; Sasson,
V.; Aidelberg, G.; Bren, A.; Zeevi, D.; Weinberger, A.; Alon, U.; Milo, R.; Segal, E., Promoters
maintain their relative activity levels under different growth conditions. Mol Syst Biol 2013,
9, 701.
6. Cheirsilp, B.; Suwannarat, W.; Niyomdecha, R., Mixed culture of oleaginous
yeast Rhodotorula glutinis and microalga Chlorella vulgaris for lipid production from industrial
wastes and its use as biodiesel feedstock. N Biotechnol 2011, 28 (4), 362-8.
7. Saha, A.; Johnston, T. G.; Shafranek, R. T.; Goodman, C. J.; Zalatan, J. G.;
Storti, D. W.; Ganter, M. A.; Nelson, A., Additive Manufacturing of Catalytically Active Living
Materials. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2018, 10 (16), 13373-13380.
8. Qian, F.; Zhu, C.; Knipe, J. M.; Ruelas, S.; Stolaroff, J. K.; DeOtte, J. R.;
Duoss, E. B.; Spadaccini, C. M.; Henard, C. A.; Guarnieri, M. T.; Baker, S. E., Direct Writing
of Tunable Living Inks for Bioprocess Intensification. Nano Lett 2019, 19 (9), 5829-5835.