Difference between revisions of "Team:BJ101ID/Model"
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
<p>Each observer was given nine pieces of paper from three experimental groups, on average, but the observers did not know which group each piece came from. After observing all the experiments, each observer rated the nine pieces of paper he or she had. The experimental results were presented in the form of observer score, with a full score of 5 and a baseline score of 3 for each item in the control group. After the data is collected, the three scores given by each observer on each set of papers are averaged to obtain the final data point. Through linear fitting by Matlab, 8 data of each group were linearly fitted to obtain approximate evaluation results. The final result is shown below:</p> | <p>Each observer was given nine pieces of paper from three experimental groups, on average, but the observers did not know which group each piece came from. After observing all the experiments, each observer rated the nine pieces of paper he or she had. The experimental results were presented in the form of observer score, with a full score of 5 and a baseline score of 3 for each item in the control group. After the data is collected, the three scores given by each observer on each set of papers are averaged to obtain the final data point. Through linear fitting by Matlab, 8 data of each group were linearly fitted to obtain approximate evaluation results. The final result is shown below:</p> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/a/a6/T--BJ101ID--model1.png" alt="Blog Details Image" data-aos="fade-up" data-aos-duration="1800"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/a/a6/T--BJ101ID--model1.png" alt="Blog Details Image" data-aos="fade-up" data-aos-duration="1800"> | ||
| − | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/1/14/T--BJ101ID--model2.png"> | + | <p>In these line-fitting graphs, the a-axis stands for eight observers, and the b-axis stands for the rating score evaluated by each observer. After plotting these points, we used Matlab with the formula to draw the fitting lines. These lines help us estimate the overall trends of observers’ evaluation toward certain properties of a different group of paper.</p> |
| + | <p>In conclusion, based on the analysis, we found that the paper with chitosan and sericin had the best evaluations in the perspective of flatness, compliance, and folding endurance, compared with the control group, experimental group 1, and experimental group 2. Therefore, we decided to add both sericin and chitosan in our operated recycled paper.</p> | ||
| + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/1/14/T--BJ101ID--model2.png"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/8/8a/T--BJ101ID--model3.png"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/8/8a/T--BJ101ID--model3.png"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/6/64/T--BJ101ID--model4.png"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/6/64/T--BJ101ID--model4.png"> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:23, 21 October 2021
