To determine the increase in transformation efficiency of our modified L. casei
(KO) compared to the wild L. casei (Wild), we spread our Petri dishes by differing volumes of bacteria
solutions and cultured them under identical conditions. At the end of our experiment, we measured their
OD600.
Additionally, we investigated the optimal conditions for the growth of our modified L. casei using varying
volumes of bacteria seed solutions
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
<div class="sub-nav"> | <div class="sub-nav"> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
− | <li><a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Shanghai_HS_ID/ | + | <li><a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Shanghai_HS_ID/Parts" class="sub-nav-74">Parts |
Collection</a></li> | Collection</a></li> | ||
<li><a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Shanghai_HS_ID/Engineering" | <li><a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Shanghai_HS_ID/Engineering" | ||
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
<div class="sub-content"> | <div class="sub-content"> | ||
<div class="sub-title">MODEL</div> | <div class="sub-title">MODEL</div> | ||
− | <div class="article-content"> | + | <div class="article-content">To determine the increase in transformation efficiency of our modified L. casei |
− | + | (KO) compared to the wild L. casei (Wild), we spread our Petri dishes by differing volumes of bacteria | |
− | + | solutions and cultured them under identical conditions. At the end of our experiment, we measured their | |
− | + | OD<sub>600</sub>. <br /> | |
− | + | Additionally, we investigated the optimal conditions for the growth of our modified L. casei using varying | |
− | + | volumes of bacteria seed solutions | |
+ | </div> | ||
<div class="img-wrap no-margin"> | <div class="img-wrap no-margin"> | ||
<span>Table 1. OD<sub>600</sub> of cultured L. casei</span> | <span>Table 1. OD<sub>600</sub> of cultured L. casei</span> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/f/f0/T--Shanghai_HS_ID--model01.png" alt="" /> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/f/f0/T--Shanghai_HS_ID--model01.png" alt="" /> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <div class="article-content"> | + | <div class="article-content">Based on our scatter plots, we utilized a quadratic polynomial equation to |
− | + | construct our model : | |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="img-wrap no-margin"> | <div class="img-wrap no-margin"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/b/bd/T--Shanghai_HS_ID--model02.png" alt="" /> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/b/bd/T--Shanghai_HS_ID--model02.png" alt="" /> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <div class="article-content"> | + | <div class="article-content">Our coding is given below:</div> |
<div class="article-content"> | <div class="article-content"> | ||
<b> | <b> | ||
Line 133: | Line 134: | ||
</b> | </b> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | <div class="article-content"> | + | <div class="article-content">Our calculations revealed the constants of the solved quadratic polynomial |
− | equations | + | equations for the KO group and Wild group, respectively.</div> |
− | + | ||
<div class="img-wrap no-margin"> | <div class="img-wrap no-margin"> | ||
<span style="margin-bottom: 20px;">Table 2. Model results</span> | <span style="margin-bottom: 20px;">Table 2. Model results</span> | ||
Line 160: | Line 160: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="img-wrap no-margin"> | <div class="img-wrap no-margin"> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/4/4e/T--Shanghai_HS_ID--chgt3.jpg" alt="" /> |
<span>Figure 1. Comparison between two fitting curves of KO group(red) and Wild group(blue)</span> | <span>Figure 1. Comparison between two fitting curves of KO group(red) and Wild group(blue)</span> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="article-title">Conclusion</div> | <div class="article-title">Conclusion</div> | ||
− | <div class="article-content"> | + | <div class="article-content">We can see in figure 1 that our modified L. casei displays a significantly higher |
− | transformation efficiency than the wild L. casei especially | + | transformation efficiency than the wild L. casei, especially with less than 100 ul of initial bacteria seed |
− | solution | + | solution.</div> |
− | + | <div class="article-content">The equation model visualizing the transformation rate of the modified L. casei | |
− | <div class="article-content"> | + | (shown below) can be used to analyze the relationship between the volume of the bacteria seed solution used |
− | + | and the final OD<sub>600</sub> of the cultures. The data model can also assist future expression efficiency | |
− | + | tests<br /> | |
− | + | With a more elaborate model, we would also be able to manipulate the variables and adjust the volume of the | |
− | + | bacteria seed solution for other cultures. | |
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | OD<sub>600</sub> | + | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | bacteria seed solution for | + | |
<div class="article-content" style="text-align: center;"><b>Model for the modified L. casei: </b>f(x) = | <div class="article-content" style="text-align: center;"><b>Model for the modified L. casei: </b>f(x) = | ||
0.0003x<sup>3</sup> - | 0.0003x<sup>3</sup> - |
Latest revision as of 17:59, 19 October 2021
MODEL
Table 1. OD600 of cultured L. casei
Based on our scatter plots, we utilized a quadratic polynomial equation to
construct our model :
Our coding is given below:
“
clear;clc;
v0=[50 100 150];
od10=[0.035 0.289 3.84];
od20=[0.255 1.984 5.21];
p1=polyfit(v0,od10,2)
p2=polyfit(v0,od20,2)
v=[50:150];
od1=polyval(p1,v);
od2=polyval(p2,v);
plot(v,od1,'b','LineWidth',2)
hold on
plot(v,od2,'r','LineWidth',2)
plot(v0,od10,'k*','LineWidth',2)
plot(v0,od20,'g*','LineWidth',2)
hold off
”
clear;clc;
v0=[50 100 150];
od10=[0.035 0.289 3.84];
od20=[0.255 1.984 5.21];
p1=polyfit(v0,od10,2)
p2=polyfit(v0,od20,2)
v=[50:150];
od1=polyval(p1,v);
od2=polyval(p2,v);
plot(v,od1,'b','LineWidth',2)
hold on
plot(v,od2,'r','LineWidth',2)
plot(v0,od10,'k*','LineWidth',2)
plot(v0,od20,'g*','LineWidth',2)
hold off
”
Our calculations revealed the constants of the solved quadratic polynomial
equations for the KO group and Wild group, respectively.
Table 2. Model results
Sample | p1 | p2 | p3 |
KO | 0.0007 | -0.0938 | 3.0780 |
Wild | 0.0003 | -0.0103 | 0.0230 |
Figure 1. Comparison between two fitting curves of KO group(red) and Wild group(blue)
Conclusion
We can see in figure 1 that our modified L. casei displays a significantly higher
transformation efficiency than the wild L. casei, especially with less than 100 ul of initial bacteria seed
solution.
The equation model visualizing the transformation rate of the modified L. casei
(shown below) can be used to analyze the relationship between the volume of the bacteria seed solution used
and the final OD600 of the cultures. The data model can also assist future expression efficiency
tests
With a more elaborate model, we would also be able to manipulate the variables and adjust the volume of the bacteria seed solution for other cultures.
With a more elaborate model, we would also be able to manipulate the variables and adjust the volume of the bacteria seed solution for other cultures.
Model for the modified L. casei: f(x) =
0.0003x3 -
0.0103x2 + 0.0230