Team:NAU-CHINA/Model/Conditions Optimization Model

Conditions Optimization Model

1 Abstract

2 Brief Introduction

3 Experimental scheme design

4 Model establishment and solving

1 Abstract





In order to optimize the yield of SeNPs by engineered bacteria and provide theoretical guidance for later engineered production, response surface method is used to study the yield of SeNPs under different conditions.

In Response Surface Method, according to Box-Behnken Design(BBD)’s central combination test principle, we take temperature, selenite concentration and pH as test factors, take yield of SeNPs as response value and carry out experimental design of 3 factors and 3 levels. We obtain regression equation and make variance analysis and response surface analysis by establishing the model with Design-Export 8.0.1. Combined with the intuitive contour map and three-dimensional graph, the interactive influence of different factors on the experimental results is obtained.

Finally, the optimal experimental conditions are as follows: the temperature is 30.26 ℃, the pH is 6.75, and the selenite concentration is 14.33mM.

Figure 1.1 Flow chart

2 Brief Introduction





Response Surface Method

Box-Behnken Design (BBD) is a commonly used method in response surface design. For example, we take three factors and design them with three levels of each and code them as (-1, 0, 1). Set 0 as the center point, +1 and -1 as the high and low values corresponding to the cubic point respectively. The distribution of experimental points designed by BBD is shown in the Figure 2.1, and the points on the figure represent the test carried out. There are 17 test groups in total:

Figure 2.1 Distribution test points of BBD

Through quadratic regression fitting, the quadratic equation is obtained, including primary term, quadratic term and interaction term, the main effect and interaction effect are analyzed and the optimal value is finally obtained.

The multivariate quadratic regression equation is described as:

where $Y$ is the response value, $x_{i}$ and $x_{j}$ are the coding variables, $\beta_{0}$ are the intercept, and $\beta_{i}$, $\beta_{j}$, $\beta_{ij}$ are the coefficients of the primary term, quadratic term and interaction term respectively.

3 Experimental scheme design





3.1 Determination of factors

There are many factors affecting the yield of SeNPs, and each factor has many levels to screen.

After reviewing relevant literature and communicating with the wet lab, we finally determine three factors on the response surface: temperature, selenite concentration and pH value, which are the main influencing factors on SeNPs yield.

3.2 Experiment process of producing SeNPs

The effects of temperature, concentration of sodium selenite concentration and pH value on the yield of SeNPs are investigated. The specific lab steps and details in this section can be seen in part Engineering.

3.3 Single factor experiment

3.3.1 Effect of temperature

When the pH value is 7 and the selenite concentration is 12mM, the relationship between the yield of SeNPs and the change of temperature is shown in Figure 3.1.

Figure 3.1 The relationship between the yield of SeNPs and the change of temperature

As can be seen from the Figure 3.1, the yield of SeNPs increases with the temperature increasing. But when temperature reaches 30℃, if we keep increasing the temperature, the yield of SeNPs begins to decrease, which may be due to the reason that within a certain range, the yield of SeNPs obtained by reduction is proportional to the concentration of selenite, and the more raw materials, the more production can be get, but if selenite concentration exceeds a certain range, it will be toxic to E.coli, inhibit its normal physiological activity and growth and even cause death. Thus 30 ℃ is more suitable.

3.3.2 Effect of selenite concentration

When the pH value is 7 and the temperature is 30 ℃, the relationship between the yield of SeNPs and the change of selenite concentration is shown in Figure 3.2.

Figure 3.2 The relationship between the yield of SeNPs and the change of selenite concentration

As can be seen from the Figure 3.2, the yield of SeNPs increases with selenite concentration increasing. But when selenite concentration reaches 12mM, if we keep increasing selenite concentration, the yield of SeNPs begins to decrease, which may be due to the reason that within a certain range, the yield of SeNPs obtained by reduction is proportional to the concentration of selenite, and the more raw materials, the more production can be get, but if selenite concentration exceeds a certain range, it will be toxic to E.coli, inhibit its normal physiological activity, growth and even cause death. Thus 12mM is more suitable.

3.3.3 Effect of pH

When the temperature is 30 ℃ and the selenite concentration is 12mM, the relationship between the yield of SeNPs and the change of pH value is shown in Figure 3.3.

Figure 3.3 The relationship between the yield of SeNPs and the change of pH value

As can be seen from the Figure 3.3, the yield of SeNPs increases with the increase of pH. But when pH reaches 8, if we keep increasing pH, the yield of SeNPs begins to decrease, which may be due to the reason that necessary enzymes for bacterial metabolism need to be kept at a certain range of pH to work effectively, if the pH is too low or too high, the protein conformation of the enzyme may change, resulting in decreased enzyme activity, or even inactivation. Thus pH 7-8 is more suitable.

Finally, combined with the actual biological situation and the results of previous experiments, we determine that the three levels of temperature, concentration of selenite and pH are (16 ℃, 30 ℃, 37 ℃), (12 mM, 15mM, 18mM) and (6, 7, 8).

4 Model establishment and solving





4.1 Establishment of model

Based on single factor experiment, yield of SeNPs is taken as the response value. We take three factors, temperature (A 16℃,30℃,37℃), selenite concentration (B 12mM,15mM,18mM) and pH (C 6,7,8) as the experimental factors, which significantly affected the yield of SeNPs. The factors and levels of Box-Behnken Design are shown in Table 1, and the test results are shown in Table 2.

Table 1 Test factors and levels
Factors Level
-1 0 1
$A$.Temperature/℃ 16 30 37
$B$.Selenite concentration 12 15 18
$C$.pH 6 7 8
Table 2 Box-Behnken Design results and analysis
Number Actual levels of variables Code levels of variables The yield of SeNPs by engineered bacteria
1 30 15 7 0 0 0 0.031
2 30 15 7 0 0 0 0.0288
3 30 15 7 0 0 0 0.0293
4 30 15 7 0 0 0 0.03
5 16 15 6 -1 0 -1 0.0001
6 37 15 6 1 0 -1 0.0204
7 16 15 8 -1 0 1 0.0001
8 37 15 8 1 0 1 0.0001
9 16 12 7 -1 -1 0 0.0001
10 30 12 8 0 -1 1 0.0202
11 30 12 6 0 -1 -1 0.0222
12 30 12 7 0 -1 0 0.0268
13 30 12 8 0 -1 1 0.0235
14 37 18 7 1 1 0 0.0229
15 30 18 6 0 1 -1 0.0216
16 16 18 7 -1 1 0 0.0001
17 30 18 8 0 1 1 0.0001

Fitting the results in Table 2 with Design expert V8.0.1, we can get regression equation as follows:

ySeNPs=0.028+0.00827A-0.00266B-0.0042C-0.00093AB-0.00478AC-0.00582BC-0.013A2-0.0035B2-0.0093C2

4.2 Description of regression equation

4.2.1 Normal plot of Residuals

Figure 4.1 Normal plot of Residuals

It can be seen from Figure 4.1 that the points are uniformly distributed near the straight line, so we think that the distribution of residuals accords with the normal distribution, and the equation has high credibility.

4.2.2 Residual vs. Predict

Figure 4.2 Plot of Residual vs. Predict

It can be seen from Figure 4.2, there is no regularity between the residual distribution of the predicted value and the residual value. In line with the correct distribution law of the residual of the predicted value and residual value, it can be seen that the regression equation of the model has high credibility.

4.2.3 Predict vs.Actual

Figure 4.3 Plot of Predict vs.Actual

It can be seen from the Figure 4.3 that the predicted value and the actual value are evenly distributed in a straight line. And by comparing the correct distribution law between the predicted value and the actual value, it can be seen that the regression equation of the model has high credibility.

4.2.4 Residual vs. Factors

Figure 4.4 Plot of Residual vs. Temperature

Figure 4.5 Plot of Residual vs. Selenite concentration

Figure 4.6 Plot of Residual vs. pH

Through the analysis of Figure 4.4, Figure 4.5 and Figure 4.6, we can see that the absolute values of our residuals are all less than the maximum threshold.

To sum up, the regression equation calculated by the model can precisely reflect our experiment, and the regression equation obtained by the model can accurately obtain the best experimental conditions.

4.3 Results analysis of Response Surface Method

Table 3: Analysis of variance
Source SS df Mean Square F Value Prob > F
Model 0.002441 9 0.000271 11.66635 0.0019 significant
$A$ 0.000417 1 0.000417 17.92302 0.0039
$B$ 0.0000565 1 0.0000565 2.430858 0.1629
$C$ 0.000143 1 0.000143 6.149162 0.0422
$AB$ 0.00000268 1 0.00000268 0.115278 0.7442
$AC$ 0.0000097 1 0.000097 4.171979 0.0804
$BC$ 0.000158 1 0.000158 6.812719 0.0349
$A^2$ 0.000416 1 0.000416 17.87148 0.0039
$B^2$ 0.0000476 1 0.0000476 2.048208 0.1955
$C^2$ 0.00034 1 0.00034 14.63052 0.0065
Residual 0.000163 7 0.0000233
Lack of Fit 0.000155 3 0.0000515 25.22224 0.0046 significant
Pure Error 0.0000082 4 0.00000204
Cor Total 0.002604 16

Furthermore, the error statistical analysis of the fitting regression equation is carried out, and the precision, multivariate correlation coefficient, credibility and accuracy are calculated by Design-Expert software, which are shown in table 4.

Table 4: More sophisticated analysis of variance
Std. Dev. 0.004822 R-Squared 0.937498
Mean 0.016312 Adj R-Squared 0.857139
C.V. % 29.56214 Pred R-Squared -0.14278
PRESS 0.002976 Adeq Precision 8.896265

From this table, $R_{adj}^2-R_{pred}^2<0.2$, these two values are high and close, indicating that our regression equation can fully explain the technological process. Adeq Precision is the ratio of effective signal to noise, and is considered reasonable (more than 4).

The response surface method also overcomes the defect that the orthogonal test can not give intuitive graphs. According to the quadratic equation model, the three-dimensional response surface and contour map of the interaction between the experimental factors are made respectively to investigate the effect of the interaction of the other two factors on the yield of SeNPs when a factor is fixed at the center value.

The response surface is a three-dimensional surface diagram formed by response values on various factors. The greater the influence of factors on response values it has, the steeper the surface. The shape of contour line can reflect the significance of interaction between two factors. Ellipse represents significant interaction between two factors, while circle represents insignificant interaction between two factors.

As for the response surface curves of the interaction of temperature, selenite concentration, and pH on the yield of SeNPs, please look at Figure 4.7, Figure 4.8, Figure 4.9.

Figure 4.7 Interactive effect between temperature and selenite concentration on the yield of SeNPs

Figure 4.8 Interactive effect between temperature and pH on the yield of SeNPs

Figure 4.9 Interactive effect between selenite concentration and pH on the yield of SeNPs

From the contour lines in Figure 4.7, Figure 4.8, Figure 4.9, we can directly see that the interaction between selenite concentration and pH is significant, while the interaction between selenite concentration and temperature, pH and temperature is not significant.

Through the model analysis, the optimum production conditions are as follows: the temperature is 30.26 ℃, the pH is 6.75, and the selenite concentration is 14.33mM. Under this condition,the predicted yield of SeNPs is 0.0315562g. When it is applied in large-scale production, we'll see striking improvement.



[1]Li L, Zhang S, He Q, Hu X B. Application of response surface methodology in experimental design and optimization[J]. Laboratory research and exploration, 2015, 34(08): 41-45.

[2]Li P, Chen X Z, Zhuang W Y. Optimization of solid state fermentation conditions of Trichoderma kangning strain 8985 with high cellulase production. Journal of fungus, 2021, 40(04): 743-758.

[3]Nasrin Mollania, Reza Tayebee,Fatemeh Narenji-Sani. An environmentally benign method for the biosynthesis of stable selenium nanoparticles[J]. Research on Chemical Intermediates, 2016, 42(5):8-11.