(Prototype team page) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <html lang="en"> | |
− | + | ||
− | <html> | + | |
+ | <head> | ||
+ | <meta charset="UTF-8"> | ||
+ | <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge"> | ||
+ | <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"> | ||
+ | <title>ECNUAS</title> | ||
+ | <link rel="stylesheet" | ||
+ | href="https://2021.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Template:ECNUAS/Main_CSS&action=raw&ctype=text/css" /> | ||
+ | </head> | ||
− | <div class=" | + | <body> |
− | < | + | <nav class="head-nav clearfix"> |
− | < | + | <div class="top-block"></div> |
− | < | + | <div class="top-nav-bar"> |
− | < | + | <ul class="clearfix"> |
− | + | <span class="small-logo"></span> | |
− | + | <li> | |
− | < | + | <a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:ECNUAS">Home</a> |
− | + | </li> | |
− | + | <li> | |
− | < | + | <a href="">Project</a> |
− | < | + | <div class="sub-nav"> |
− | + | <ul> | |
− | < | + | <li><a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:ECNUAS/Description" |
− | + | class="sub-nav-74">Description</a></li> | |
− | < | + | <li><a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:ECNUAS/Experiments" |
− | + | class="sub-nav-74">Experiments</a></li> | |
− | </div> | + | <li><a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:ECNUAS/Results" class="sub-nav-74">Results</a></li> |
− | < | + | <li><a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:ECNUAS/Proof_Of_Concept" class="sub-nav-52">Proof Of |
− | + | Concept</a></li> | |
− | <div class=" | + | <li><a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:ECNUAS/Notebook" class="sub-nav-52">Notebook</a> |
− | < | + | </li> |
− | < | + | <li><a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:ECNUAS/Safety">Safety</a></li> |
− | + | </ul> | |
− | < | + | </div> |
− | + | </li> | |
− | </ | + | <li> |
− | + | <a href="">Parts</a> | |
− | </div> | + | <div class="sub-nav"> |
− | + | <ul> | |
− | <div class=" | + | <li><a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:ECNUAS/Collection" class="sub-nav-74">Parts |
− | < | + | Collection</a></li> |
− | + | <li><a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:ECNUAS/Engineering" | |
− | < | + | class="sub-nav-74">Engineering</a></li> |
− | </ | + | <li><a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:ECNUAS/Contribution" |
− | + | class="sub-nav-74">Contribution</a></li> | |
− | </ | + | </ul> |
− | + | </div> | |
− | </div> | + | </li> |
− | + | <li> | |
− | + | <a href="">Human Practices</a> | |
− | < | + | <div class="sub-nav"> |
− | < | + | <ul> |
− | < | + | <li><a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:ECNUAS/Human_Practices" |
− | < | + | class="sub-nav-74">Integrated Human Practice</a></li> |
− | + | <li><a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:ECNUAS/Communication" | |
− | <ul> | + | class="sub-nav-74">Communication</a></li> |
− | <li><a href="https:// | + | <li><a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:ECNUAS/Fundraising" |
− | <li><a href="https:// | + | class="sub-nav-74">Fundraising</a></li> |
− | <li><a href="https:// | + | </ul> |
− | <li><a | + | </div> |
− | < | + | </li> |
− | < | + | <li> |
− | < | + | <a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:ECNUAS/Implementation">Implementation</a> |
− | </ | + | </li> |
− | </div> | + | <li> |
− | </div> | + | <a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:ECNUAS/Entrepreneurship">Entrepreneurship</a> |
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li class="active"> | ||
+ | <a href="#">Model</a> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li> | ||
+ | <a href="">Team</a> | ||
+ | <div class="sub-nav"> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li><a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:ECNUAS/Members" class="sub-nav-74">Team | ||
+ | Members</a></li> | ||
+ | <li><a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:ECNUAS/Attributions" | ||
+ | class="sub-nav-74">Attributions</a></li> | ||
+ | <li><a href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:ECNUAS/Collaborations" | ||
+ | class="sub-nav-74">Collaborations</a></li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </nav> | ||
+ | <div class="sub-banner"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/e/ed/T--ECNUAS--parts_collection02.png" alt="" /> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="sub-content"> | ||
+ | <div class="sub-title">MODEL</div> | ||
+ | <div class="article-content">When we conducted the function tests of our biosensor, we noticed that basically | ||
+ | there is an increasing trend of the fluorescence intensity of bacteria C as the induction hour increases. | ||
+ | Therefore, we decided to analyze the quantitative relationship between the fluorescence intensity and the | ||
+ | detection time by building a model and determine the most appropriate hour for our biosensor to confirm the | ||
+ | result.</div> | ||
+ | <div class="article-content">Below is the initial data:</div> | ||
+ | <div class="img-wrap no-margin"> | ||
+ | <span>Table 1. The Fluorescence intensity of the bacteria C solution under different concentrations of | ||
+ | cyanuric acid (CYA) by time</span> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/a/a7/T--ECNUAS--_model01.jpg" alt=""> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="article-content">As each group was conducted with three duplicates in order to minimize the error, | ||
+ | we used the average to draw scatter plots by MATLAB to further find the fitting function. After several | ||
+ | attempts, we chose the cubic polynomial equation to adapt to our data and the results are given below where | ||
+ | all fitting degrees are higher than 0.99, even reaching 1.</div> | ||
+ | <div class="article-content">The Cubic Polynomial Equation: <i>y = p<sub>1</sub>x<sup>3</sup> + | ||
+ | p<sub>2</sub>x<sup>2</sup> + p<sub>3</sub>x + | ||
+ | p<sub>4</sub></i></div> | ||
+ | <div class="img-wrap no-margin"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/b/b2/T--ECNUAS--_model03.jpg" alt=""> | ||
+ | <span>Figure 1. The model result when CYA concentration was given 10 uM/L</span> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="img-wrap no-margin"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/2/2e/T--ECNUAS--_model04.jpg" alt=""> | ||
+ | <span>Figure 2. The fitting curve of the model when CYA concentration was given 10 uM/L</span> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="img-wrap no-margin"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/3/33/T--ECNUAS--_model05.jpg" alt=""> | ||
+ | <span>Figure 3. The model result when CYA concentration was given 30 uM/L</span> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="img-wrap no-margin"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/7/71/T--ECNUAS--_model06.jpg" alt=""> | ||
+ | <span>Figure 4. The fitting curve of the model when CYA concentration was given 30 uM/L</span> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="img-wrap no-margin"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/a/a6/T--ECNUAS--_model07.jpg" alt=""> | ||
+ | <span>Figure 5. The model result when CYA concentration was given 50 uM/L</span> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="img-wrap no-margin"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/4/49/T--ECNUAS--_model08.jpg" alt=""> | ||
+ | <span>Figure 6. The fitting curve of the model when CYA concentration was given 50 uM/L</span> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="article-title">Comparison</div> | ||
+ | <div class="article-content">The coding we used to combine all fitting curves in one graph is given below:</div> | ||
+ | <div class="article-content"> | ||
+ | “<br /> | ||
+ | clear;clc;<br /> | ||
+ | t0=[0 1 2 4 6];<br /> | ||
+ | c10=[549.883333 945.896667 1768.9 4414.20667 6189.83];<br /> | ||
+ | c30=[490.156667 895.046667 1993.16 4270.30333 5789.22333];<br /> | ||
+ | c50=[674.69 1177.77 1953.85667 3809.30667 5341.35333];<br /> | ||
+ | pc10=polyfit(t0,c10,3);<br /> | ||
+ | pc30=polyfit(t0,c30,3);<br /> | ||
+ | pc50=polyfit(t0,c50,3);<br /> | ||
+ | t=[0:0.1:6];<br /> | ||
+ | yc10=polyval(pc10,t);<br /> | ||
+ | yc30=polyval(pc30,t);<br /> | ||
+ | yc50=polyval(pc50,t);<br /> | ||
+ | plot(t,yc10,'r',t,yc30,'b',t,yc50,'g','LineWidth',1)<br /> | ||
+ | x1=0.5;y1=647.6;x2=2.1;y2=2037;x3=2.5;y3=2396;x4=3.3;y4=3472;<br /> | ||
+ | hold on<br /> | ||
+ | plot(x1,y1,'k*');<br /> | ||
+ | plot(x2,y2,'k*');<br /> | ||
+ | plot(x3,y3,'k*');<br /> | ||
+ | plot(x4,y4,'k*');<br /> | ||
+ | hold off<br /> | ||
+ | ” | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="img-wrap no-margin"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/5/51/T--ECNUAS--_model09.jpg" alt=""> | ||
+ | <span>Figure 7. Comparison among three fitting curves</span> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="article-title">Conclusion</div> | ||
+ | <div class="article-content"> | ||
+ | Based on the model results (Fig. 1, 3, 5), the constants (p1) of the cubic are picked and listed | ||
+ | below:<br /> | ||
+ | p1 in the model (CYA=10 uM): -44.03<br /> | ||
+ | p1 in the model (CYA=30 uM): -37.33<br /> | ||
+ | p1 in the model (CYA=50 uM): -19.03 | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div class="article-content">Hence, we could infer that the less the concentration of CYA is given, the higher | ||
+ | the changing rate of the curve presents. Especially when the detection hour is given more than 3.3 hours, | ||
+ | the changing rate of the fitting curve (CYA=10 uM) is obviously higher than the other two, namely, our live | ||
+ | bacteria biosensor is more sensitive to the lower concentration of CYA solution.</div> | ||
+ | <div class="article-content">In this case, our biosensor with the live bacteria carrier would be more | ||
+ | recommended for the low concentration detection of CYA and the detection time is recommended to wait for | ||
+ | more than 3.3 hours in order to amplify the differences.</div> | ||
+ | <div class="article-content">In addition, it also indicates that Cell-Free Expression Biosensor is necessary | ||
+ | which is expected to cover the detection on the higher concentration of CYA.</div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <footer class="footer"> | ||
+ | <section class="footer-wrap"> | ||
+ | <div class="footer-contact">Contact Info</div> | ||
+ | <img class="footer-qrcode" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/9/9a/T--ECNUAS--qrcode.jpg" /> | ||
+ | <p class="contact-tips margin-bottom-10">WWeChat Official Account: <i style="color:#070707;">Silent | ||
+ | Spring</i> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p class="contact-tip">Email Contact: <i style="color:#070707;">samlishensheng@qq.com</i> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | </footer> | ||
+ | </body> | ||
+ | <script> | ||
+ | let liTags = document.querySelectorAll(".top-nav-bar > ul > li"); | ||
+ | let len = liTags.length; | ||
+ | for (let i = 0; i < len; i++) { | ||
+ | liTags[i].onclick = function (e) { | ||
+ | //先移除所有的点击样式 | ||
+ | for (let j = 0; j < len; j++) { | ||
+ | liTags[j].classList.remove("active"); | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | //再添加点击样式 | ||
+ | let li = e.currentTarget; | ||
+ | li.classList.add("active"); | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | </script> | ||
</html> | </html> |
Revision as of 16:06, 16 October 2021
MODEL
When we conducted the function tests of our biosensor, we noticed that basically
there is an increasing trend of the fluorescence intensity of bacteria C as the induction hour increases.
Therefore, we decided to analyze the quantitative relationship between the fluorescence intensity and the
detection time by building a model and determine the most appropriate hour for our biosensor to confirm the
result.
Below is the initial data:
Table 1. The Fluorescence intensity of the bacteria C solution under different concentrations of
cyanuric acid (CYA) by time
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/a/a7/T--ECNUAS--_model01.jpg)
As each group was conducted with three duplicates in order to minimize the error,
we used the average to draw scatter plots by MATLAB to further find the fitting function. After several
attempts, we chose the cubic polynomial equation to adapt to our data and the results are given below where
all fitting degrees are higher than 0.99, even reaching 1.
The Cubic Polynomial Equation: y = p1x3 +
p2x2 + p3x +
p4
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/b/b2/T--ECNUAS--_model03.jpg)
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/2/2e/T--ECNUAS--_model04.jpg)
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/3/33/T--ECNUAS--_model05.jpg)
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/7/71/T--ECNUAS--_model06.jpg)
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/a/a6/T--ECNUAS--_model07.jpg)
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/4/49/T--ECNUAS--_model08.jpg)
Comparison
The coding we used to combine all fitting curves in one graph is given below:
“
clear;clc;
t0=[0 1 2 4 6];
c10=[549.883333 945.896667 1768.9 4414.20667 6189.83];
c30=[490.156667 895.046667 1993.16 4270.30333 5789.22333];
c50=[674.69 1177.77 1953.85667 3809.30667 5341.35333];
pc10=polyfit(t0,c10,3);
pc30=polyfit(t0,c30,3);
pc50=polyfit(t0,c50,3);
t=[0:0.1:6];
yc10=polyval(pc10,t);
yc30=polyval(pc30,t);
yc50=polyval(pc50,t);
plot(t,yc10,'r',t,yc30,'b',t,yc50,'g','LineWidth',1)
x1=0.5;y1=647.6;x2=2.1;y2=2037;x3=2.5;y3=2396;x4=3.3;y4=3472;
hold on
plot(x1,y1,'k*');
plot(x2,y2,'k*');
plot(x3,y3,'k*');
plot(x4,y4,'k*');
hold off
”
clear;clc;
t0=[0 1 2 4 6];
c10=[549.883333 945.896667 1768.9 4414.20667 6189.83];
c30=[490.156667 895.046667 1993.16 4270.30333 5789.22333];
c50=[674.69 1177.77 1953.85667 3809.30667 5341.35333];
pc10=polyfit(t0,c10,3);
pc30=polyfit(t0,c30,3);
pc50=polyfit(t0,c50,3);
t=[0:0.1:6];
yc10=polyval(pc10,t);
yc30=polyval(pc30,t);
yc50=polyval(pc50,t);
plot(t,yc10,'r',t,yc30,'b',t,yc50,'g','LineWidth',1)
x1=0.5;y1=647.6;x2=2.1;y2=2037;x3=2.5;y3=2396;x4=3.3;y4=3472;
hold on
plot(x1,y1,'k*');
plot(x2,y2,'k*');
plot(x3,y3,'k*');
plot(x4,y4,'k*');
hold off
”
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/5/51/T--ECNUAS--_model09.jpg)
Conclusion
Based on the model results (Fig. 1, 3, 5), the constants (p1) of the cubic are picked and listed
below:
p1 in the model (CYA=10 uM): -44.03
p1 in the model (CYA=30 uM): -37.33
p1 in the model (CYA=50 uM): -19.03
p1 in the model (CYA=10 uM): -44.03
p1 in the model (CYA=30 uM): -37.33
p1 in the model (CYA=50 uM): -19.03
Hence, we could infer that the less the concentration of CYA is given, the higher
the changing rate of the curve presents. Especially when the detection hour is given more than 3.3 hours,
the changing rate of the fitting curve (CYA=10 uM) is obviously higher than the other two, namely, our live
bacteria biosensor is more sensitive to the lower concentration of CYA solution.
In this case, our biosensor with the live bacteria carrier would be more
recommended for the low concentration detection of CYA and the detection time is recommended to wait for
more than 3.3 hours in order to amplify the differences.
In addition, it also indicates that Cell-Free Expression Biosensor is necessary
which is expected to cover the detection on the higher concentration of CYA.