Difference between revisions of "Team:Yonsei Korea/Contribution"

Line 147: Line 147:
 
             <div class="outer"></div>
 
             <div class="outer"></div>
 
             <div class="inner">
 
             <div class="inner">
                 <a style="text-decoration: none;">ATTRIBUTIONS</a>
+
                 <a style="text-decoration: none;">CONTRIBUTION</a>
 
                 <div class="paragraph">  
 
                 <div class="paragraph">  
                     <a style="text-decoration: none;">PRINCIPAL&nbsp;INVESTIGATORS&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+
                     <a style="text-decoration: none;">PARTS&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 
                         <svg>
 
                         <svg>
 
                             <line x1="0" y1="16" x2="100%" y2="16" style="stroke:#707070;stroke-width:1" />
 
                             <line x1="0" y1="16" x2="100%" y2="16" style="stroke:#707070;stroke-width:1" />
Line 159: Line 159:
 
                     <br/><br/><br/><br/><br/>
 
                     <br/><br/><br/><br/><br/>
 
                     </p>
 
                     </p>
                     <a style="text-decoration: none;">ADVISORS&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
+
                     <a style="text-decoration: none;">TROUBLESHOOTING&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 
                         <svg>
 
                         <svg>
 
                             <line x1="0" y1="16" x2="100%" y2="16" style="stroke:#707070;stroke-width:1" />
 
                             <line x1="0" y1="16" x2="100%" y2="16" style="stroke:#707070;stroke-width:1" />
 
                         </svg>
 
                         </svg>
 
                     </a>             
 
                     </a>             
                     <p style="font-size:14px;font-family:'PT Sans Caption', sans serif;"><em>Milan Balaz:</em> Dr. Milan Balaz was cooperative in helping us on how to find financial support by contacting investors. He also gave us advice on the nanoparticle part of our research as he specializes in Chiral nanoparticles, DNA templated nano-assemblies, and other research protocols.  
+
                     <p style="font-size:14px;font-family:'PT Sans Caption', sans serif;">
                    <br/><br/><br/><br/><br/>
+
<em>1. Earlier stage:</em><br/>
 +
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;In our earlier stage, the biggest trouble our team faced was getting financial supports. Since we were the first to participate in the iGEM from Yonsei University, we had to start from the very beginning such as gathering team members, contacting potential primary instructors, or getting approval from the faculty for using a laboratory. Our initial team members assembled from our mutual school course, Industrial Bioconvergence. One student, who happens to be our team leader Symbat, introduced the competition to our class and those who were interested in the competition joined the team.<br/><br/>
 +
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Despite the excitement we had in our first meeting, the first wave of hardship came as the registration fee due date was coming up. Since we could not afford it by ourselves, we decided to reach out to companies, faculty, professors, and alumni to get financial support. After making a list of potential sponsors, we contacted them via emails and phone calls. Even though most of them did not respond or rejected our request, we did not give up trying another option. Thankfully, several professors started donating their own money to help us fundraise our registration fee and a few companies suggested helping us with their equipment and material accessibility. We were able to focus on choosing our topic and start planning out our laboratory work owing to their grateful aid.<br/><br/>
 +
<em>2. Mid-stage (laboratory - optimizing phase):</em><br/>
 +
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Launching our laboratory work proved to be no small task in itself; we quickly learned of the many obstacles that posed challenges to undergraduates pursuing research. Due to the COVID-19 situation, it was immensely difficult for us to search for labs to conduct our research and advisors to supervise us. Eventually, we were thankfully able to contact our primary investigators and advisor and begin research. We conducted our summer research in between our PI’s lab and empty undergraduate educational laboratories through the understanding of the office. Thus, we were able to begin the experimental phase of our research.<br/><br/>
 +
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;However, even with access to a lab and many wonderful advisors and graduate students to get advice from, our experiments did not go smoothly. Our cleavage assay, while seeming fine in theory, did not show detectable results even after multiple repetitions and attempts at optimization. Although frustrated, we constantly searched for new methods to optimize our experiments. After a copious amount of effort, we finally got the results we wanted by ordering our synthetic DNA from a different source as our experiment was extremely base-pair sensitive. We all learned of the hardships and frustrations that could occur from conducting research through the experience, as well as how to go about solving them.<br/><br/>
 +
<em>3. Collaborations:</em><br/>
 +
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Although many of our team members had enjoyed previous research experience at various institutions, it was the first time for any of us to conduct student-driven research. We had no established connections with other teams, and we had to start everything from scratch with no idea where to start. As a result, we were somewhat timid to present our research to other teams who seemed already fully experienced and confident in their research, as well as the science behind it. Still, we endeavored to manifest ourselves out there and look for collaboration opportunities so we could learn and grow with other teams. As we gained more experience presenting our research and sharing our experiences, we learned that many teams underwent similar struggles and challenges which we went through regarding not just research, but the iGEM experience as a whole. As we talked to several teams, we became more sure in our research and began to own it genuinely. Collaborations opened our eyes and helped us find out what kind of researchers we pictured ourselves to be.<br/><br/>
 +
<em>4. Conclusion:</em><br/>
 +
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;We believe that our efforts as the first team to participate from our university have contributed greatly to laying the groundwork for those who will later challenge the same competition. Also, we hope that our work can positively influence Korea and other countries that do not have an established culture of iGEM.<br/><br/>
 
                     </p>
 
                     </p>
 
                     <a style="text-decoration: none;">LABORATORY&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
 
                     <a style="text-decoration: none;">LABORATORY&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

Revision as of 04:27, 18 October 2021

IGEM_YONSEI

Introducing:

Our Team

CONTRIBUTION
PARTS        

Pratik Shah: Dr. Pratik Shah was one of the main advisors since the start of our research project. He gave us positive reinforcement and was very open-minded. He not only shared his knowledge but also his experience with a previous iGEM competition that he helped a team from Denmark. He was very generous in letting us use his lab when we had a hard time finding a place where we could conduct our research. Dr. Pratik Shah assisted us in analyzing every experiment according to the results we get every week.

Seongwook Yang: Dr. Seongwook Yang was the first to open up his laboratory to us as well as advise and mentor us in the very beginning of starting our research. He helped us with the brainstorming stage and gave us many valuable insights as to creating a unique and impactful project. He also was one of our biggest sponsors for our initial funding stage with his company XenoHelix.




TROUBLESHOOTING        

1. Earlier stage:
    In our earlier stage, the biggest trouble our team faced was getting financial supports. Since we were the first to participate in the iGEM from Yonsei University, we had to start from the very beginning such as gathering team members, contacting potential primary instructors, or getting approval from the faculty for using a laboratory. Our initial team members assembled from our mutual school course, Industrial Bioconvergence. One student, who happens to be our team leader Symbat, introduced the competition to our class and those who were interested in the competition joined the team.

    Despite the excitement we had in our first meeting, the first wave of hardship came as the registration fee due date was coming up. Since we could not afford it by ourselves, we decided to reach out to companies, faculty, professors, and alumni to get financial support. After making a list of potential sponsors, we contacted them via emails and phone calls. Even though most of them did not respond or rejected our request, we did not give up trying another option. Thankfully, several professors started donating their own money to help us fundraise our registration fee and a few companies suggested helping us with their equipment and material accessibility. We were able to focus on choosing our topic and start planning out our laboratory work owing to their grateful aid.

2. Mid-stage (laboratory - optimizing phase):
    Launching our laboratory work proved to be no small task in itself; we quickly learned of the many obstacles that posed challenges to undergraduates pursuing research. Due to the COVID-19 situation, it was immensely difficult for us to search for labs to conduct our research and advisors to supervise us. Eventually, we were thankfully able to contact our primary investigators and advisor and begin research. We conducted our summer research in between our PI’s lab and empty undergraduate educational laboratories through the understanding of the office. Thus, we were able to begin the experimental phase of our research.

    However, even with access to a lab and many wonderful advisors and graduate students to get advice from, our experiments did not go smoothly. Our cleavage assay, while seeming fine in theory, did not show detectable results even after multiple repetitions and attempts at optimization. Although frustrated, we constantly searched for new methods to optimize our experiments. After a copious amount of effort, we finally got the results we wanted by ordering our synthetic DNA from a different source as our experiment was extremely base-pair sensitive. We all learned of the hardships and frustrations that could occur from conducting research through the experience, as well as how to go about solving them.

3. Collaborations:
    Although many of our team members had enjoyed previous research experience at various institutions, it was the first time for any of us to conduct student-driven research. We had no established connections with other teams, and we had to start everything from scratch with no idea where to start. As a result, we were somewhat timid to present our research to other teams who seemed already fully experienced and confident in their research, as well as the science behind it. Still, we endeavored to manifest ourselves out there and look for collaboration opportunities so we could learn and grow with other teams. As we gained more experience presenting our research and sharing our experiences, we learned that many teams underwent similar struggles and challenges which we went through regarding not just research, but the iGEM experience as a whole. As we talked to several teams, we became more sure in our research and began to own it genuinely. Collaborations opened our eyes and helped us find out what kind of researchers we pictured ourselves to be.

4. Conclusion:
    We believe that our efforts as the first team to participate from our university have contributed greatly to laying the groundwork for those who will later challenge the same competition. Also, we hope that our work can positively influence Korea and other countries that do not have an established culture of iGEM.

LABORATORY        

Hari Chandana: Dr. Hari Chandana is a 2nd-year Ph.D. student who assisted us whenever we needed help on doing experiments in the lab. Hari also gave us advice while sharing her experiences in the lab which helped us to conduct our experiments without difficulties.




FINANCIAL SUPPORT        

Crowdfunding
We want to thank and appreciate those who helped us financially using Go Get funding and other sources.

Some of the people who supported us financially using GoGetFunding:
Scott Ellsworth, Huasha Zhang, Hyunsang Kim, David Kim, and 5 anonymous donors.

We also want to thank the Yonsei UIC faculty who assisted us financially;
Nam-On Ku, Song Kiwon, Ho Jaeyun, Natalja M. Deng, Michael L. Ratnapalan, Manuel Valencia Cabrera Jr., Chad Benjamin Denton, Michael Michael, Lee Do Hyung, Chung Sunglan and Janie Sue Brooks.

Others
Nick DeCesare (Instagram, Twitter @LSXYZ9) and Tim Lipovsek (Instagram, Twitter @lol_nemesis).

Company Sponsors
We also want to thank the companies that sponsored us.

TEAM ATTRIBUTIONS          OTHERS        

Yujeong Kim - Helped us in reaching out to sponsors and managing administrations and communications overview.

Tuvshno Tuvshinbayar Otgonbayar - Assisted us with video production and video editing for the promotion video.