Difference between revisions of "Team:Michigan/Engineering"

 
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- # TODO: #6 Fix table caption font--><!-- # TODO: #7 Fix citations links font size--><html lang="en"><head><meta charset="utf-8"/><meta content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" name="viewport"/><title>Engineering Success | iGEM Michigan</title><script src="https://2020.igem.org/common/MathJax-2.5-latest/MathJax.js?config=TeX-AMS-MML_HTMLorMML"></script><link href="https://2021.igem.org/Template:Michigan/css/contentCSS?action=raw&amp;ctype=text/css" rel="stylesheet"/></head><body><!-- # TODO: #6 Fix table caption font--><!-- # TODO: #7 Fix citations links font size--><nav class="navbar navbar-expand-xl fixed-top"><div class="container d-flex justify-content-between"><a class="navbar-brand d-lg-inline-block" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan"><span>iGEM </span>Michigan</a><button aria-controls="navbarNav" aria-expanded="false" aria-label="Toggle navigation" class="navbar-toggler" data-target="#navbarNav" data-toggle="collapse" type="button"><span class="navbar-toggler-icon"></span></button><div class="collapse navbar-collapse" id="navbarNav"><ul class="navbar-nav ml-auto"><li class="nav-item dropdown"><a aria-expanded="false" aria-haspopup="true" class="nav-link dropdown-toggle" data-toggle="dropdown" href="#" id="navbarTeamDropdown" role="button">Team</a><div aria-labelledby="navbarTeamDropdown" class="dropdown-menu"><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Team">Team</a><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Attributions">Attributions</a><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Collaborations">Collaborations</a></div></li><li class="nav-item dropdown"><a aria-expanded="false" aria-haspopup="true" class="nav-link dropdown-toggle" data-toggle="dropdown" href="#" id="navbarProjectDropdown" role="button">Project</a><div aria-labelledby="navbarProjectDropdown" class="dropdown-menu"><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Contribution">Contribution</a><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Description">Description</a><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Modeling">Modeling</a><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Experiments">Experiments</a><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Engineering">Engineering</a><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Notebook">Notebook</a><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Results">Results</a><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Implementation">Implementation</a></div></li><li class="nav-item dropdown"><a aria-expanded="false" aria-haspopup="true" class="nav-link dropdown-toggle" data-toggle="dropdown" href="#" id="navbarPartsDropdown" role="button">Parts</a><div aria-labelledby="navbarPartsDropdown" class="dropdown-menu"><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Parts">Parts</a></div></li><li class="nav-item"><a class="nav-link" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Human_Practices">Human Practices</a></li></ul></div><div class="d-flex" id="themeSwitchWrapper"><i class="far fa-sun"></i><div id="themeSwitch"><label class="switch" for="themeSwitchInput"><input id="themeSwitchInput" type="checkbox"/><span class="slider round"></span></label></div><i class="far fa-moon"></i></div></div></nav><header class="d-flex justify-content-center align-items-center"><div class="container"><h1>Engineering Success</h1><p class="lead pl-1">Following the Engineering Design Cycle</p><hr class="my-4"/></div></header><main><div class="container"><div class="row"><div class="sidebar col-lg-3"><div class="nav" id="contents"><h5>Contents</h5><ul></ul></div></div><div class="content col-lg-9"><article><div class="image"><img alt="Biology Engineering Cycle" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/3/3e/T--Michigan--img--engin_cycle.png" style="width: 50%"/><p>Figure 1: Biology Engineering Cycle</p></div><h1>PCR Optimization</h1><p>While our PCR experiment to add an alpha factor sequence to the encapsulin was not a standout success, its optimization did follow the engineering cycle of designing, building, testing, and learning, and then repeating this process iteratively.</p><p><em>Design</em></p><p>We first designed the primers for inverse fusion PCR, considering factors like melting temperature and linker position in designing the sequences.</p><p><em>Build</em></p><p>We then used these primer sequences to run inverse fusion PCR.</p><p><em>Test</em></p><p>We tested the results by running gel electrophoresis and sequencing the plasmids. While certain gels looked promising, successful sequencing proved elusive.</p><p><em>Learn</em></p><p>When the results deviated from our expectations, these discrepancies were analyzed and parameters like primer concentration, annealing temperature, and polymerase type were adjusted before repeating the cycle.</p><h1>Encapsulin Protein Purification</h1><p>Likewise for our purification of the encapsulins without alpha factor, we also followed the principles of the engineering cycle.</p><p><em>Design</em></p><p>We first designed a plasmid containing the encapsulin protein carrying an mNeonGreen fluorescent cargo for visualization and a his-tag used for protein purification.</p><p><em>Build</em></p><p>Then, we transformed the plasmid into competent BL21 E. Coli cells for the protein to be expressed. Afterward, we performed encapsulin protein purification using the his-tag. In doing so, the encapsulin protein was “built” by bacterial machinery.</p><p><em>Test</em></p><p>To evaluate our results, we ran an SDS page gel to confirm the size of the protein matched the expected size of the encapsulin. This assay indicated successful purification. We also viewed the encapsulin under a fluorescent microscope with inconclusive results. The protein concentration was evaluated with a NanoDrop.</p><div class="image"><img alt="SDS Page Results" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/6/6b/T--Michigan--img--n13.png" style="width: 50%"/><p>Figure 2: SDS Page Results</p></div><div class="image"><img alt="Fluorescence Microscopy (possible encapsulin clusters circled in white)" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/1/12/T--Michigan--img--n14_2.png" style="width: 80%"/><p>Figure 3: Fluorescence Microscopy (possible encapsulin clusters circled in white)</p></div><p><em>Learn</em></p><p>While the assays seemed to indicate successful encapsulin purification, a low protein concentration led us to believe that higher specific activity could be achieved in further iterations of the engineering cycle.</p></article></div></div></div></main><footer><div class="container"><p>Built using the iGEM Wiki Starter Pack by BITS Goa.</p><p>Code released under the MIT license.</p><p>Based on <a href="https://getbootstrap.com">Bootstrap</a> and themes <a href="https://bootswatch.com/flatly/">Flatly</a> and <a href="https://bootswatch.com/darkly/">Darkly</a> from <a href="https://bootswatch.com/">Bootswatch</a>.</p><p>Icons from <a href="flaticon.com">Flaticon</a>. Images from <a href="https://unsplash.com">Unsplash</a>. Web fonts from <a href="https://fonts.google.com">Google</a>.</p></div></footer><script src="https://2021.igem.org/Template:Michigan/content-bundleJS?action=raw&amp;ctype=text/javascript"></script></body></html>
+
<!-- # TODO: #6 Fix table caption font--><!-- # TODO: #7 Fix citations links font size--><html lang="en"><head><meta charset="utf-8"/><meta content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" name="viewport"/><title>Engineering Success | iGEM Michigan</title><script src="https://2020.igem.org/common/MathJax-2.5-latest/MathJax.js?config=TeX-AMS-MML_HTMLorMML"></script><link href="https://2021.igem.org/Template:Michigan/css/contentCSS?action=raw&amp;ctype=text/css" rel="stylesheet"/></head><body><!-- # TODO: #6 Fix table caption font--><!-- # TODO: #7 Fix citations links font size--><nav class="navbar navbar-expand-xl fixed-top"><div class="container d-flex justify-content-between"><a class="navbar-brand d-lg-inline-block" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan"><span>iGEM </span>Michigan</a><button aria-controls="navbarNav" aria-expanded="false" aria-label="Toggle navigation" class="navbar-toggler" data-target="#navbarNav" data-toggle="collapse" type="button"><span class="navbar-toggler-icon"></span></button><div class="collapse navbar-collapse" id="navbarNav"><ul class="navbar-nav ml-auto"><li class="nav-item dropdown"><a aria-expanded="false" aria-haspopup="true" class="nav-link dropdown-toggle" data-toggle="dropdown" href="#" id="navbarTeamDropdown" role="button">Team</a><div aria-labelledby="navbarTeamDropdown" class="dropdown-menu"><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Team">Team</a><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Attributions">Attributions</a><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Collaborations">Collaborations</a></div></li><li class="nav-item dropdown"><a aria-expanded="false" aria-haspopup="true" class="nav-link dropdown-toggle" data-toggle="dropdown" href="#" id="navbarProjectDropdown" role="button">Project</a><div aria-labelledby="navbarProjectDropdown" class="dropdown-menu"><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Contribution">Contribution</a><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Description">Description</a><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Model">Model</a><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Experiments">Experiments</a><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Engineering">Engineering</a><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Notebook">Notebook</a><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Results">Results</a><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Implementation">Implementation</a></div></li><li class="nav-item dropdown"><a aria-expanded="false" aria-haspopup="true" class="nav-link dropdown-toggle" data-toggle="dropdown" href="#" id="navbarPartsDropdown" role="button">Parts</a><div aria-labelledby="navbarPartsDropdown" class="dropdown-menu"><a class="dropdown-item" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Parts">Parts</a></div></li><li class="nav-item"><a class="nav-link" href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:Michigan/Human_Practices">Human Practices</a></li></ul></div><div class="d-flex" id="themeSwitchWrapper"><i class="far fa-sun"></i><div id="themeSwitch"><label class="switch" for="themeSwitchInput"><input id="themeSwitchInput" type="checkbox"/><span class="slider round"></span></label></div><i class="far fa-moon"></i></div></div></nav><header class="d-flex justify-content-center align-items-center"><div class="container"><h1>Engineering Success</h1><p class="lead pl-1">Following the Engineering Design Cycle</p><hr class="my-4"/></div></header><main><div class="container"><div class="row"><div class="sidebar col-lg-3"><div class="nav" id="contents"><h5>Contents</h5><ul></ul></div></div><div class="content col-lg-9"><article><div class="image"><img alt="Biology Engineering Cycle" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/3/3e/T--Michigan--img--engin_cycle.png" style="width: 50%"/><p>Figure 1: Biology Engineering Cycle</p></div><h1>PCR Optimization</h1><p>While our PCR experiment to add an alpha factor sequence to the encapsulin was not a standout success, its optimization did follow the engineering cycle of designing, building, testing, and learning, and then repeating this process iteratively.</p><p><em>Design</em></p><p>We first designed the primers for inverse fusion PCR, considering factors like melting temperature and linker position in designing the sequences.</p><p><em>Build</em></p><p>We then used these primer sequences to run inverse fusion PCR.</p><p><em>Test</em></p><p>We tested the results by running gel electrophoresis and sequencing the plasmids. While certain gels looked promising, successful sequencing proved elusive.</p><p><em>Learn</em></p><p>When the results deviated from our expectations, these discrepancies were analyzed and parameters like primer concentration, annealing temperature, and polymerase type were adjusted before repeating the cycle.</p><h1>Encapsulin Protein Purification</h1><p>Likewise for our purification of the encapsulins without alpha factor, we also followed the principles of the engineering cycle.</p><p><em>Design</em></p><p>We first designed a plasmid containing the encapsulin protein carrying an mNeonGreen fluorescent cargo for visualization and a his-tag used for protein purification.</p><p><em>Build</em></p><p>Then, we transformed the plasmid into competent BL21 E. Coli cells for the protein to be expressed. Afterward, we performed encapsulin protein purification using the his-tag. In doing so, the encapsulin protein was “built” by bacterial machinery.</p><p><em>Test</em></p><p>To evaluate our results, we ran an SDS page gel to confirm the size of the protein matched the expected size of the encapsulin. This assay indicated successful purification. We also viewed the encapsulin under a fluorescent microscope with inconclusive results. The protein concentration was evaluated with a NanoDrop.</p><div class="image"><img alt="SDS Page Results" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/6/6b/T--Michigan--img--n13.png" style="width: 50%"/><p>Figure 2: SDS Page Results</p></div><div class="image"><img alt="Fluorescence Microscopy (possible encapsulin clusters circled in white)" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2021/1/12/T--Michigan--img--n14_2.png" style="width: 80%"/><p>Figure 3: Fluorescence Microscopy (possible encapsulin clusters circled in white)</p></div><p><em>Learn</em></p><p>While the assays seemed to indicate successful encapsulin purification, a low protein concentration led us to believe that higher specific activity could be achieved in further iterations of the engineering cycle.</p></article></div></div></div></main><footer><div class="container"><p>Built using the iGEM Wiki Starter Pack by BITS Goa.</p><p>Code released under the MIT license.</p><p>Based on <a href="https://getbootstrap.com">Bootstrap</a> and themes <a href="https://bootswatch.com/flatly/">Flatly</a> and <a href="https://bootswatch.com/darkly/">Darkly</a> from <a href="https://bootswatch.com/">Bootswatch</a>.</p><p>Icons from <a href="flaticon.com">Flaticon</a>. Images from <a href="https://unsplash.com">Unsplash</a>. Web fonts from <a href="https://fonts.google.com">Google</a>.</p></div></footer><script src="https://2021.igem.org/Template:Michigan/content-bundleJS?action=raw&amp;ctype=text/javascript"></script></body></html>

Latest revision as of 23:11, 21 October 2021

Engineering Success | iGEM Michigan

Engineering Success

Following the Engineering Design Cycle


Biology Engineering Cycle

Figure 1: Biology Engineering Cycle

PCR Optimization

While our PCR experiment to add an alpha factor sequence to the encapsulin was not a standout success, its optimization did follow the engineering cycle of designing, building, testing, and learning, and then repeating this process iteratively.

Design

We first designed the primers for inverse fusion PCR, considering factors like melting temperature and linker position in designing the sequences.

Build

We then used these primer sequences to run inverse fusion PCR.

Test

We tested the results by running gel electrophoresis and sequencing the plasmids. While certain gels looked promising, successful sequencing proved elusive.

Learn

When the results deviated from our expectations, these discrepancies were analyzed and parameters like primer concentration, annealing temperature, and polymerase type were adjusted before repeating the cycle.

Encapsulin Protein Purification

Likewise for our purification of the encapsulins without alpha factor, we also followed the principles of the engineering cycle.

Design

We first designed a plasmid containing the encapsulin protein carrying an mNeonGreen fluorescent cargo for visualization and a his-tag used for protein purification.

Build

Then, we transformed the plasmid into competent BL21 E. Coli cells for the protein to be expressed. Afterward, we performed encapsulin protein purification using the his-tag. In doing so, the encapsulin protein was “built” by bacterial machinery.

Test

To evaluate our results, we ran an SDS page gel to confirm the size of the protein matched the expected size of the encapsulin. This assay indicated successful purification. We also viewed the encapsulin under a fluorescent microscope with inconclusive results. The protein concentration was evaluated with a NanoDrop.

SDS Page Results

Figure 2: SDS Page Results

Fluorescence Microscopy (possible encapsulin clusters circled in white)

Figure 3: Fluorescence Microscopy (possible encapsulin clusters circled in white)

Learn

While the assays seemed to indicate successful encapsulin purification, a low protein concentration led us to believe that higher specific activity could be achieved in further iterations of the engineering cycle.